Mobile QR Code QR CODE

  1. (School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea)
  2. (Department of Electronic Engineering, Andong National University, Andong 36729, Korea)



AlGaN/GaN HEMT, proton irradiation effects, reliability analysis, simulation modeling

I. INTRODUCTION

Gallium nitride (GaN), with its wide bandgap (WBG) characteristics, is emerging as a promising candidate for next-generation high-efficiency power devices and radio frequency (RF) electronic applications. This is due to its superior material properties, such as a high electric break-down field, high-electron saturation velocity, and high mobility in a readily available heterojunction 2-D electron gas (2DEG) channel [1]. GaN's high breakdown field of 3.3 MV/cm [2] is 11 times higher than Si at 0.3 MV/cm. Consequently, for a given voltage, a GaN layer can be 11 times thinner than its Si counterpart, resulting in reduced resistivity. This significantly lowers resistive losses in switching mode power supplies (SMPSs) [3]. High-electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) based on the AlGaN/GaN heterojunction are exemplary devices for space applications due to GaN's superior properties. Satellites and their electronic components are exposed to harsh radiation environments [4], particularly form Earth's geomagnetic fields. Space radiation includes heavy ions and protons, which generate neutrons and other byproducts upon collision with devices. For materials and devices to be useful in high orbit and space environments, they must withstand particle irradiation damage [5]. GaN HEMTs, used in low Earth orbit satellites, are typically subjected to fluxes of high-energy protons and electrons, as well as neutrons or gam-ma rays if used in radiation-hard electronics for nuclear or military systems [6]. GaN is recongnized for its radiation resistance [7,8,9], making it a highly researche topic. Previous research has focused on evaluating HEMTs (MIS-HEMTs) with various gate dielectric layers, including SiN [10,11], MgO/Sc${}_{2}$O${}_{3}$ [12], Gd${}_{2}$O${}_{3}$ [13], SiN/Al${}_{2}$O${}_{3}$ [14,15], and poly-AIN/SiN [16]. Studies have also explored InAlAs/InGaAs hetero junction structures of InP-based HEMTs at different incident angles [17]. However, these studies primarily focused on the impact of dielectrics on radiation resistance and varied proton incident angles [17,18]. We identified and analyzed trends to determine how proton irradiation afftects the device and why its reliability deteriorates. The degradation in reliability after proton irradiation leads to performance issues, which must be addressed. In this study, we used the AlGaN/GaN HEMT process to measure DC characteristics and current collapse. Following this, the devices were irraddiated with protons at 5 MeV energy and a fluence of $5 \times 10^{13}$ cm${}^{-2}$. We then remeasured the DC characteristics and current collapse to analyze the changes in device performance. We measured the current characteristics of the devices before and after proton irradiation to evaluated the changes and assess the influence of protons Additionally, we performed simulation fitting for further analysis. This study provides valuable data on the impact of proton radiation on power semiconductor devices, which can be utilized in developing high-reliability power semiconductor technology.

II. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

Fig. 1 shows the schematic cross-sectional view of the AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistor (HEMT) and Table 1 summarizes the parameters used in this study. The gate length (L${}_{\rm G}$) is 3 $\mu$m, the gate-to-source distance (D${}_{\rm GS}$) is 5 $\mu$m, and the gate-to-drain distance (D${}_{\rm GD}$) is 5 $\mu$m. The epitaxial growth details are as follows: the AlGaN barriere thickness (T${}_{\rm AlGaN}$) is 20 nm, the GaN channel thickness (T${}_{\rm Channel}$) is 180 nm, the GaN buffer thickness (T${}_{\rm buffer}$) is 2.3 $\mu$m, and the substrate thickness (T${}_{\rm sub}$) is 430 $\mu$m. Fig. 2 illustrates the growth of AlGaN/GaN HEMT structures on sapphire using metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) equipment. Fabrication began with the dry etching process for electrical isolation between devices, targeting a depth of $\sim$300 nm using ICP equipment, with Cl2 gas (100 sccm), Ar gas (10 sccm), RFT (power 800) and RFB (power 200). We deposited a 30 nm-thick SiN as passivation layer using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). After the SiN deposition layer, a spin coater was used to apply photoresist (PR) to 5000 RPM, for 35 s. Following a soft bake ($90^\circ{\rm C}$, for 90 s), exposure (810 W/cm${}^{2}$, for 30 s) was performed using MA6_1KW equipment, PR and SiN wet etching were conducted using PS-800, and BOE, respectively. Source and drain metallization (Si/Ti/Al/Ni/Au) was performed using an electronic-beam evaporator (ERC). Lift-off was executed with PS-800, and RTP ($850^\circ{\rm C}$, for 80 s) converted the Schottky contact into ohmic contact. Subsequent wet etching removed the SiN layer removal, forming the source and drain. The ohmic contact was confirmed by measuring TLM. Finally, after gate photolithography, gate metallization (Ni/Al/Ni) was carried out using an ERC completing the HEMT device fabrication. The HEMTs were irradiated with 5 MeV protons at a fluence of $5 \times 10^{13}$ cm${}^{-2}$ using the proton linear accelerator at the Korea Multi-Purpose Accelerator Complex (KOMAC). The current characteristics of the fully fabricated devices were measured using a B1500 semiconductor device analyzer (K Keysight, Santa Roda, California, USA). After proton irradiation, the devices were re-measured to assess the changes.

Fig. 1. Schematic cross-sectional view of the AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistor (HEMT).

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig1.png

Fig. 2. Process flow of the HEMT and proton irradiation.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig2.png

Table 1. Parametes of the AlGaN/GaN HEMT.

Parameter

Value

Gate Length (LG)

3 $\mu$mm

Gate to Source Distance (DGS)

5 $\mu$mm

Gate to Drain Distance (DGD)

5 $\mu$mm

AlGaN Barrier Thickness (TAlGaN)

20 nm

GaN Channel Thickness (TChannel)

180 nm

GaN Buffer Thickness (Tbuffer)

2.3 $\mu$mm

Substrate Thickness (Tsub)

430 $\mu$mm

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

1. Direct Current (DC) Characteristics

Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) show the output curves (I${}_{\rm D}$-V${}_{\rm D}$) before and after proton irradiation at a drain voltage (V${}_{\rm D}$) of 10 V. As seen in Fig. 3(b), the current characteristics deteriorated significantly after irradiation with 5 MeV protons at a fluence of $5 \times 10^{13}$ cm${}^{-2}$. The static resistance (R${}_{\rm on}$) value was measured at a gate voltage (V${}_{\rm G}$) of 1 V and drain voltage (V${}_{\rm D}$) of 0.1V. The R${}_{\rm on}$value increased from 62.5 $\Omega\cdot$mm before irradiation to 98.135 $\Omega\cdot$mm after irradiation, at V${}_{\rm G} = 1$ V, respresenting a 57% increase. This indicates substantial damage to the devices from proton irradiation. Additionally, we evaluated the buffer leakage current characteristics by measuring the current. Fig.~4 shows the buffer current before and after proton irradiation. Post-irradiation data, represented by the red open symbols (A and A$'$), show higher current values at oltages below 10 V. As the voltage value increases, the current initially rises (marked as A$'$) and then decreases again indicating changes in the buffer current characteristics due to proton irradiation. Because of thisinflection, it cannot be definitively stated the buffer current decreased after proton irradiation. The observed current characteristics are due to measurements taken through a buffer pattern, which captures both buffer and surface leakage currents. As a result, at voltages below 10 V (marked as A), the post-irradiation current is larger than the pre-irradiation current As the voltage increases, electrons become trapped in th buffer layer's trap, causing the current to decrease.

Figs. 5(a) and 5(b) show the transfer curves (I${}_{\rm D}$-V${}_{\rm GS}$) before and after proton irradiation at a drain voltages (V${}_{\rm D}$) of 0, 0.1, and 7 V. The on-current (I${}_{\rm on}$) values of the before and after proton irradiation are $3.51 \times 10^{-1}$ and $2.57 \times 10^{-1}$ A/mm at V${}_{\rm D} = 7$ V, respectively. The corresponding off-current (I${}_{\rm off}$) values for the AlGaN/GaN HEMT are $1.35 \times 10 ^{-6}$ and $2.56 \times 10^{-6}$ A/mm, respectively, at V${}_{\rm D} = 7$ V. Additionally, the I${}_{\rm on} /$I${}_{\rm off}$ ratios are $2.6 \times 10^{5}$ and $1.0 \times 10^{5}$, respectively. The threshold voltage (V${}_{\rm t}$) was calculated using the g${}_{\rm m,max}$ method, with the V${}_{\rm t}$ values $-3.24$ V before irradiation and $-3.27$ V after irradiation. This indicates that the I${}_{\rm on}$ decreased by 26.78% and the surface leakage current increased, leading to an 89.63% increase in I${}_{\rm off}$.

However, there was no significant change in V${}_{t}$ suggesting minimal damage in the 2DEG channel region that determines V${}_{\rm t}$. For more accurate analysis, the R${}_{\rm on}$ value as a function of D${}_{\rm GD}$ was obtained. Fig. 6 shows the R${}_{\rm on}$ values as a function of D${}_{\rm GD}$ before and after proton irradiation. Closed black symbols represent R${}_{\rm on}$ values before proton irradiation, while open red symbols indicate R${}_{\rm on}$ values after irradiation. For a D${}_{\rm GD}$ of 5 $\mu$m, the R${}_{\rm on}$ value increases from 6.58 $\Omega\cdot$mm before irradiation to 7.66 $\Omega\cdot$mm after irradiation. Similarly, for D${}_{\rm GD}$ values of 10, 20, and 30 $\mu$m, the R${}_{\rm on}$ values change from 7.58, 11.83, and 15.46 $\Omega\cdot$mm before irradiation to 9.14, 13.04, and 16.73 $\Omega\cdot$mm after proton irradiation. The key point in this figure is that the slope of the line representing the R${}_{\rm on}$ values does not significantly change after proton irradiation. This slope corresponds to the sheet resistance (R${}_{sh}$), which is the resistance of the 2DEG channel region formed between the AlGaN and the GaN layers. The slope values before and after irradiation. This slope corresponds to the sheet resistance (R${}_{sh}$), which is the resistance of the 2DEG channel region formed between the AlGaN and the GaN layers. The slope values before and after rradiation are $\sim$0.3552 and 0.3628, respectively, indicating that the degradation of device characteristics is not due to the 2DEG channel layer. Therefore, the changes in device characteristics must be attributed to other factors, specifically device resistance Fig. 7 illustrates the AlGaN/GaN HEMT, where the R${}_{\rm on}$value is the sum of R${}_{\rm S}$, R${}_{\rm Ch}$, R${}_{\rm GD}$, and R${}_{\rm D}$, as shown in Equation (1).

Here, R${}_{\rm S}$ and R${}_{\rm D}$ are the source and drain resistances, which correspond to metal contacts, and R${}_{\rm Sh}$ represents the sheet resistance or 2DEG resistance. Since the slope value representing R${}_{\rm Sh}$ remains nearly unchanged, the increase in R${}_{\rm on}$ value after proton irradiation must be due to the chanages in the source and drain resistances, i.e., the metal resistance. Additionally, it was observed that the metal regions suffered more damage compared to the 2DEG regions when subjected to the same proton irradiation across the device. Figs. 8(a) and 8(b) schematically illustrate proton irradiation throughout the AlGaN/GaN HEMT and the interaction when a proton collides with metal. The higher density ad specific properties of the metal contacts result in greater damage compared to the 2DEG regions when exposed to proton irradiation. When a hydrogen proton irradiates with the device, it collides with the very small metal atoms. This collision produces secondary particles, such as protons or neutrons leading to significant damage around the metal areas.

Fig. 3. Output curves (I${}_{\rm D}$-V${}_{\rm D}$) (a) before and (b) after proton irradiation at a drain voltage (V${}_{\rm D}$) of 10 V.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig3a.png(a)

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig3b.png(b)

Fig. 4. Buffer current characteristics of AlGaN/GaN HEMT before and after proton irradiation.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig4.png

Fig. 5. Transfer curves (I${}_{\rm D}$-V${}_{\rm GS}$) (a) before and (b) after proton irradiation at drain voltages (V${}_{\rm D}$) of 0, 0.1, and 7 V.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig5a.png(a)

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig5b.png(b)

Fig. 6. The R${}_{\rm on}$ value according to D${}_{\rm GD}$ before and after proton irradiation.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig6.png

Fig. 7. Resistance characteristics of the AlGaN/GaN HEMT.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig7.png

Fig. 8. (a) Schematic of proton irradiation throughout the device, and (b) interation when a proton collides with metal.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig8a.png(a)

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig8b.png(b)

2. TCAD Simulation-based Analysis of Proton Irradiation Impact

We used the Atlas TCAD semiconductor device simulator from SILVACO for simulation modeling. The modeled HEMT structure consists of a gate, source, and drain are formed on an epitaxy layer with a GaN buffer layer, a channel layer, and an AlGaN layer are grown on a sapphire substrate. The AlGaN layer is 20-nm thick, while the GaN layer is 180-nm thick, with the Al composition ratio in AlGaN being $\sim$25%. The polarization between he AlGaN/GaN heterostructure is controlled based on the AlGaN layer's thickness and Al composition ratio to determine electron configuration and mobility. The model incorporates a polarization model for implementing 2DEG and a thermal model to account for heat dissipation during device operation. Based on this model, we performed transfer curve fitting before proton irradiation.We also accounted for contact resistance, which significantly affects device characteristics, particularly after irradiation. The SRIM simulation results show vacancies occurring when protons irradiate the AlGaN/GaN HEMT [19].

(1)
$ R_{on} = R_{S} + R_{D} + R_{sh}\frac{D_{GS}}{W_{G}} + R_{sh}\frac{L_{G}}{W_{G}} + R_{sh}\frac{D_{GD}}{W_{G}}\nonumber\\ = R_{S} + R_{D} + R_{sh}\left(\frac{D_{GS} + L_{G} + D_{GD}}{W_{G}}\right) . $

At a standard energy of 5 MeV protons are injected to a depth of 120 $\mu$m. Since the protons passe through the AlGaN/GaN heterojunction structure to the sapphire substrate, they affect the entire device in terms of depth, producing many Ga and N vacancies. Figs. 9(a) and 9(b) show the AlGaN/GaN HEMT simulation fitting before and after proton irradiation. The measurement values are represented by lines, while symbols indicate the simulation fitting values. The simulation incorporates polarization for 2DEG implementation and the self-heating phenomenon during device operation, The initial R${}_{\rm C}$ value was based on $1.3 \times 10^{-5}$ as referenced in [21]. As shown in Fig. 9(b), when R${}_{\rm C}$ increased to $1.9 \times 10^{-5}$, the simulated current most closely matched the measured value, indicating that R${}_{\rm C}$ increased by $\sim$1.46 times after irradiation compared to that before irradiation.

Fig. 9. (a) and (b) AlGaN/GaN HEMT simulation fitting before and after proton irradiation.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig9a.png(a)

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig9b.png(b)

3. Proton-induced degradation of current collapse characteristics

Fig. 10 shows the current collapse characteristics of the AlGaN HEMT before and after the proton irradiation at V${}_{\rm G} = 1$ V. The gate and drain biases (V${}_{\rm G_B}$, and V${}_{\rm D_B,\ }$, respectively) were $(0$ V, $0$ V$)$, $(-5$ V, $0$ V$)$, $(0$ V, $10$ V$)$, and $(-5$ V, $10$ V$)$. The pulse period and width (P${}_{\rm period}$ and P${}_{\rm width}$) were 5 ms and 100 $\mu$s, respectively. The pink symbols indicate the base voltage section without applied stress voltage. The blue and red symbols represent stress voltage applied to the gate and drain, respectively. This separation of base voltage helps in analyzing the degradation of device characteristics after proton irradiation. The R${}_{\rm on}$ value for gate lag increased from 7.37 $\Omega\cdot$mm before irradiation to 8.59 $\Omega\cdot$mm after irradiation, an increase of 16.58%. For drain lag, R${}_{\rm on}$ increased from 8.16 $\Omega\cdot$mm before irradiation to 10.88 $\Omega\cdot$mm after irradiation, an increase of 33.33%. Table 2 presents the corresponding I${}_{\rm D}$ current values at V${}_{\rm D} = 10$ V. Under the $($V${}_{\rm G_B}$, V${}_{\rm D_B}) = (0$ V, $0$ V$)$ condition, the I${}_{\rm D}$ value decreased by 5.57% after proton radiation, for the $(-5$ V, $0$ V$)$ condition, the decrease was 3.81%. Under $(0$ V, $10$ V$)$ and $(-5$ V, $10$ V$)$ conditions, the decreases were 10.29% and 10.41%, respectively. he overall current characteristic deteriorated after proton irradiation, with the drain lag showing a greater difference than the gate lag. This suggests that more traps formed in the GaN buffer layer than at the AlGaN layer interface. Consequently, as voltage is applied, electron trapping increases, leading to a decrease in the I${}_{\rm D}$ value.

Fig. 10. Pulse output curves before and after proton irradiation.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/fig10.png

Table 2. The corresponding I${}_{\rm D}$ current values at V${}_{\rm D}$ 10 V.

(VG_B, VD_B)

Before

After

(0, 0)

3.59 ×10-1 [A/mm]

3.39 ×10-1 [A/mm]

(-5, 0)

3.15 ×10-1 [A/mm]

3.03 ×10-1 [A/mm]

(0, 10)

3.40 ×10-1 [A/mm]

3.05 ×10-1 [A/mm]

(-5, 10)

2.88 ×10-1 [A/mm]

2.58 ×10-1 [A/mm]

IV. CONCLUSIONS

In this study, AlGaN/GaN HEMT was fabricated, with protons at 5 MeV energy and a dose of $5 \times 10^{13}$ cm${}^{-2}$ to analyze their behavior. The DC characteristics analysis showed that I${}_{\rm on}$ decreased by 26.78% and I${}_{\rm off}$ increased by 89.63% after irradiation. The V${}_{\rm t}$ remained relatively unchanged, at $-3.24$ V before irradiation and $-3.27$ V after irradiation, indicating that the 2DEG density, which determines V${}_{\rm t}$ did not suffer significant damage. However, the R${}_{\rm on}$ value increased by 57% from 62.5 to 98.14 $\Omega\cdot$mm. Simulation fitting results suggest that this increase is due to the contact resistance increasing by $\sim$1.46 from $1.3 \times 10^{-5}$ to $1.9\times 10^{-5}$. Additionally, the gate lag increased the R${}_{\rm on}$ value by 16.58%, from 7.37 to 8.59 $\Omega\cdot$mm, while the drain lag increased by 33.33% from 8.16 to 10.88 $\Omega\cdot$mm. This indicates that more traps were formed in the GaN buffer layer than at the AlGaN layer interface after proton irradiation. In conclusion, we believe that these findings will contribute to pre- verification research for high reliability applications, such as space and aviation semiconductors.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2020R1A2C1005087). This research was supported by National R&D Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by Ministry of Science and ICT (2022M3I7A1078936). This study was supported by the BK21 FOUR project funded by the Ministry of Education. Korea (4199990113966). This investigation was financially supported by Semiconductor Industry Collaborative Project between Kyungpook National University and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. The EDA tool was supported by the IC Design Education Center (IDEC), Korea. This work was also supported by a Research Grant of Andong National University.

References

1 
K. J. Chen, O. Häberlen, A. Lidow, C. L. Tsai, T. Ueda, Y. Uemoto, and Y. Wu, ``GaN-on-Si power technology: Devices and applications,'' IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 779-795, 2017.DOI
2 
X. Ding, Y. Zhou, and J. Cheng, ``A review of gallium nitride power device and its applications in motor drive,'' CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 54-64. 2019.DOI
3 
M. Meneghini, C. de Santi, I. Abid, M. Buffolo, M. Cioni, R. A. Khadar, et al., ``GaN-based power devices: Physics, reliability, and perspectives,'' Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 130, no. 18, 2021.DOI
4 
B. D> Weaver, T. J. Anderson, A. D. Koehler, J. K. Hite, D. I. Shahin, and K. D. Hobart, ``On the radiation tolerance of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs,'' ECS Journal of Solid-State Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 7, 2016.DOI
5 
B. D> Weaver, T. J. Anderson, T. J., A. D. Koehler, J. D. Greenlee, J. K. Hite, D. I. Shahin, et al, ``On the radiation tolerance of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs,'' ECS Journal of Solid-State Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 7. 2016.DOI
6 
S. J. Pearton, F. Ren, E. Patrick, M. E. Law, and A. Y. Polyakov, ``Ionizing radiation damage effects on GaN devices,'' ECS Journal of Solid-state Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 2. 2015.DOI
7 
B. D. Weaver, T. J. Anderson, A. D. Koehler, J. D. Greenlee, J. K. Hite, D. I. Shahin, et al, ``On the radiation tolerance of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs,'' ECS Journal of Solid-State Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 7, 2016.DOI
8 
A. Ionascut-Nedelcescu, C. Carlone, A. Houdayer, H. J. von Bardeleben, J. L. Cantin, and S. Raymond, ``Radiation hardness of gallium nitride,'' IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 49, no. 6, pp 2733-2738, 2002.DOI
9 
S. J. Pearton, F. Ren, E. Patrick, M. E. Law, and A. Y. Polyakov, ``Ionizing radiation damage effects on GaN devices,'' ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 2, 2015.DOI
10 
C. Fares, F. Ren, S. J. Pearton, G. Yang, J. Kim, C. F. Lo, and J. W. Johnson, ``Effect of proton irradiation energy on SiNx/AlGaN/GaN metal-insulator semiconductor high electron mobility transistors,'' Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, vol. 36, no. 5, 2018.DOI
11 
Z. Gao, M. F. Romero, A. Redondo-Cubero, M. A. Pampillon, E. San Andres, and F. Calle, ``Effects of Gd 2 O 3 gate dielectric on proton-irradiated AlGaN/GaN HEMTs,'' IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 611-614, 2017.DOI
12 
D. Zhang, X. Cheng, L. Shen, L. Zheng, Z. Gu, W. Zhou, et al., ``Influence of poly-AlN passivation on the performance improvement of 3-MeV proton-irradiated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs,'' IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2215-2219, 2019.DOI
13 
B. Luo, F. Ren, K. K. Allums, B. P. Gila, A. H. Onstine, C. R. Abernathy, et al., ``Proton irradiation of MgO-or Sc2O3 passivated AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistors,'' Solid-State Electronics, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1015-1020, 2003.DOI
14 
S. J. Chang, K. J. Cho, H. W. Jung, J. J. Kim, Y. J. Jang, S. B. Bae, et al., ``Improvement of proton radiation hardness using ALD-Deposited Al2O3 gate insulator in GaN-bsed MIS-HEMTs,'' ECS Journal of Solid-State Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 12, 2019.DOI
15 
J. H. Lee, D. S. Kim, J. G. Kim, W. H. Ahn, Y. Bae, and J. H. Lee, ``Effect of gate dielectrics on characteristics of high-energy proton irradiated AlGaN/GaN MISHEMTs,'' Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 184, 109473, 2021.DOI
16 
J. He, M. Feng, Y. Zhong, J. Wang, R. Zhou, H. Gao, et al., ``On-wafer fabrication of cavity mirrors for InGaN-based laser diode grown on Si,'' Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, 7922, 2018.DOI
17 
S. X. Sun, Z. C. Wei, P. H. Xia, W. B. Wang, Z. Y. Duan, Y. X. Li, et al., ``Effects of proton irradiation at different incident angles on InAlAs/InGaAs InP-based HEMTs,'' Chinese Physics B, vol. 27, no. 2, 2018.DOI
18 
Y. J. Yoon, J. S. Lee, J. K. Suk, I. M. Kang, J. H. Lee, E. J. Lee, and D. S. Kim, ``Effects of proton irradiation on the current characteristics of sin-passivated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs using a TMAH-based surface pre-treatment,'' Micromachines, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 864, 2021.DOI
19 
A. Hierro, S. A. Ringel, M. Hansen, J. S. Speck, U. K. Mishra, and S. P. Denbaars, ``Hydrogen passivation of deep levels in n-GaN,'' Applied Physics Letters, vol. 77, no. 10, pp. 1499-1501, 2000.DOI
20 
J. F. Ziegler, M. D. Ziegler, and J. P. Biersack, ``SRIM-The stopping and range of ions in matter nuclear instruments and methods in physics research,'' Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 268 no. 11-12, pp. 1818-1823, 2010.DOI
21 
Y. Yoon, J. Lee, Y. Kim, D. Kim, O. Seok, and J. Lee, ``Simulation modeling for evaluating high-energy proton irradiation effects of gallium nitride-based electronics,'' Journal of Radiation Industry, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 275-281, 2021.DOI
So Ra Jeon
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/au1.png

So Ra Jeon received her B.Sc. degree in electronic engineering from the School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Korea University (KU) Sejong Campus, Korea, in 2020, where she is currently pursuing an M.S. degree in the School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering. Her research interests include the design, fabrication, and characterization of GaN devices.

Sang Ho Lee
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/au2.png

Sang Ho Lee received his B.Sc. degree in electronics engineering from the School of Electronics Engineering (SEE), Kyungpook National University (KNU), Daegu, Korea, in 2019, where he is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in the School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering. His research interests include the design, fabrication, and characterization of gate-all-around logic devices and capacitor-less 1T-DRAM transistors.

Jin Park
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/au3.png

Jin Park received her B.Sc. degree in electronic engineering from the School of Electronics Engineering (SEE), Kyungpook National University (KNU), Daegu, Korea, in 2020, where she is pursuing a Ph.D. in the School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering. Her research interests include the design, fabrication, and characterization of gate-all-around logic devices and capacitor-less 1T-DRAM transistors.

Min Seok Kim
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/au4.png

Min Seok Kim received his B.Sc. degree in electronics engineering from the School of Electronics Engineering (SEE), Kyungpook National University (KNU), Daegu, Korea, in 2023, where he is currently pursuing an M.S. in school of Electronic and Electrical Engineering. His research interests include the design, fabrication, and characterization of logic devices and capacitor-less 1T-DRAM transistors.

Seung Ji Bae
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/au5.png

Seung Ji Bae received her B.Sc. degree in electronic engineering from the School of Electronics Engineering (SEE), Kyungpook National University (KNU), Daegu, Korea, in 2023, where she is currently pursuing an M.S. degree in the School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering. Her research interests include the design, fabrication, and characterization of capacitor-less 1T-DRAM transistors.

Jeong Woo Hong
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/au6.png

Jeong Woo Hong received his B.Sc. degree in electronic engineering from the School of Electronics Engineering (SEE), Kyungpook National University (KNU), Daegu, Korea, in 2023, where he is currently pursuing an M.S. degree in school of Electronic and Electrical Engineering. His research interests include the design, fabrication, and characterization of GaN power devices.

Won Suk Koh
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/au7.png

Won Suk Koh received his B.Sc. degree in electronic engineering from the School of Electronics Engineering (SEE), Kyungpook National University (KNU), Daegu, Korea, in 2024, where he is currently pursuing an M.S. degree in school of Electronic and Electrical Engineering. His research interests include the design, fabrication, and characterization of capacitor-less 1T-DRAM transistors.

Gang San Yun
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/au8.png

Gang San Yun received his B.Sc. degree in electronic engineering from the School of Electronics Engineering (SEE), Kyungpook National University (KNU), Daegu, Korea, in 2024, where he is currently pursuing an M.S. degree in school of Electronic and Electrical Engineering. His research interests include the design, fabrication, and characterization of capacitor-less 1T-DRAM transistors.

In Man Kang
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/au9.png

In Man Kang received his B.S. degree in electronic and electrical engineering from the School of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Kyungpook National University (KNU), Daegu, Korea, in 2001, and a Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Seoul National University (SNU), Seoul, Korea, in 2007. He worked as a teaching assistant for semiconductor process education from 2001 to 2006 at Inter-university Semiconductor Research Center (ISRC) in SNU. From 2007 to 2010, he worked as a senior engineer at Design Technology Team of Samsung Electronics Company. In 2010, he joined KNU as a full-time lecturer of the School of Electronics Engineering (SEE). Now, he is currently working as a professor. His current research interests include CMOS RF modeling, silicon nanowire devices, tunneling transistor, low-power nano CMOS, and III-V compound semiconductors. He is a member of IEEE EDS.

Young Jun Yoon
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2025.25.1.21/au10.png

Young Jun Yoon received his B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electronics engineering from the School of Electronics Engineering (SEE), Kyungpook National University (KNU), Daegu, Korea, in 2013 and 2019, respectively. He is currently assistant professor with the Deparment of Electronic Engineering, Andong National University (ANU). His research interests include simulation, fabrication, and characterization of semiconductor device.