Mobile QR Code QR CODE

  1. (Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea)



24-GHz, lower-power, RF CMOS, LNA (low noise amplifier), automotive collision avoidance radar

I. INTRODUCTION

The rapid growth of wireless communications has pursued on low power, low cost, and high performance receivers. In most cases, the millimeter wave circuits were considered by utilizing CMOS technology. The main wireless receiver task is to detect the desired modulated signals. Wireless receivers have to perform several functions such as tuning to the wanted signal carriers, filtering out the undesired signals, and amplifying the desired signal to compensate for power losses occurring during transmission (1-7).

Thanks to growing speed of radar-based collision avoidance systems, vehicles can see the other objects including pedestrian and other vehicles, anticipate accidents and collision, control the braking system and steering wheel to save the people life, and reduce the severity of collisions. Radar transceivers are installed on the vehicles which operate in the all types of weather or sometimes both laser and camera are utilized to anticipate the imminent collision on the street or highways. At first, collision avoidance systems search the surrounded area of the vehicles to detect the imminent crash. When the detection process is done, the system warns to the drivers by light, vibration in steering wheel or seat belt, and then the system based on the predefined distance fastens the seat belt and brakes, and finally controls the steering wheel to save the driver. The main frequency bands of radar applications are 24 GHz and 77~GHz. For the sake of detection of other near vehicles in the medium-short range and wide beam, 24 GHz is mainstream. The receiver for the automotive radar system operates in the band of 24 GHz frequency which is composed of LNA (low noise amplifier), down-conversion mixer, and VCO (voltage-controlled oscillator). The LNA is a crucial component for radio receivers, and it must meet several requirements such as good input matching, adequate gain and reasonably low noise figure to elevate received signal-to-noise ratio as well as energy-efficiency for battery-powered portable devices (7-9).

Fig. 1. Concept of ACC system.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.2.187/fig1.png

This paper presents low-power low-noise 24-GHz CMOS LNA for automotive collision avoidance radar. The proposed circuit is fabricated using 65 nm RF CMOS technology and it is powered by 1.2 V supply. To increase voltage gain, this circuit has cascode scheme, and it is optimized to decrease noise figure. Cascode inductive source degeneration technique is also utilized to match the circuit to source impedance.

II. CIRCUIT DESIGN AND ANALYSIS

2.1 Overview of 24 GHz Radar

The automotive radar is the most promising and robust solution to vehicle sensing requirements in terms of environmental conditions, measurement capabilities, and ease of installation. The best frequency for this radar depends on the targeted application. In fact, this choice of frequency involves trade-off between several factors such as transmitted and received powers. Fig. 1 shows a simple ACC (adaptive cruise control) system. The systems consist of three types such as short range radar (SRR), medium-short range (MRR) and long range radar (LRR). The CMOS-based 24-GHz SRR sensors with distance up to approximately 30 meters are under development for a variety of further applications. The SRR may cover many applications such as parking aid, ACC with stop and go, pre-crash or collision warning, back-up function, etc. Since it has also better performance in azimuth angle and in range measurements, it is suitable for automotive applications providing parking aid, pre-crash detection, side object detection and blind spot detection (1-6).

Fig. 2. 24 GHz CMOS LNA.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.2.187/fig2.png

2.2 Design of the proposed 24 GHz CMOS LNA

Fig. 2 shows the proposed low-power low noise-noise 24-GHz CMOS LNA. This LNA is implemented using the 65 nm RF CMOS process. This process has been retained because of its good low noise performance, the unity current gain cut-off frequency ($f_{T}$) of 120 GHz and the maximum oscillation frequency ($f_{max}$) of 140 GHz. Successful integration of the LNA at 24 GHz depends on minimizing parasitic capacitances and losses to maintain adequate gain, designing with low voltage swing for low breakdown devices, and achieving sufficient linearity required for low spectrally efficient and variable envelope modulation scheme.

Providing a resistive input impedance of 50 Ω is one critical requirement of an LNA. The 50 Ω termination is required mainly by the previously band select filter $L_{3}$ with parasitic capacitance and transistor $M_{1}$ is biased by adding parasitic capacitance to the input impedance matching. The third-order non-linear transconductance coefficient $g_{m3}$ is performed by gate-drain and gate-source capacitances of basic components, and it reduces linearity performance. To improve noise figure and linearity, we propose a CG (common gate) NMOS-PMOS inverter scheme for the cascode LNA as a linearizer. The proposed linearization method accepts NMOS and PMOS transistors into common gate configuration with the second-order and third-order nonlinearity to improve the linearity performance (9,10).

Fig. 3. Ideal view of the inverter stage.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.2.187/fig3.png

To reach very low third-order distortion and low power, it is very important to reduce the second-order and third-order nonlinearities. It is very important to minimize or cancel $g_{m2}$ and $g_{m3}$ to decrease the third-order intermodulation distortion and to improve IIP3 (third-order input intercept point). The inductor $L_{2}$, and the parasitic capacitances at the drain of $M_{2}$ and $M_{4}$ form provide broadband network.

Let’s consider drain current $I_{d_{total}}$ of $M_{1}$ through the $M_{2}$ and $M_{3}$ transistors as shown in Fig. 3. For $M_{4}$, $V_{g4}$ = $V_{dd}$, $V_{s4}$ = $V_{d3}$, $I_{d4}$ = ($V_{dd}$-$V_{d4}$)/$R_{out}$, $I_{d4}$ = $I_{d3}$ and $I_{d4}$ = 0, since $M_{1}$ is connected to the ground through capacitor $C_{1}$ for $d_{1}$ = 0. From KCL, $I_{s3}$ = $d_{1}$ + $I_{s2}$, $I_{s2}$ = $I_{s3}$, $V_{dd}$-$I_{d4}$$R_{out}$-$V_{ds4}$-$V_{ds3}$ = $V_{ds2}$, and $V_{dd}$ = $I_{d4}$$R_{out}$ + $V_{d4}$, and we obtain Eqs. (1)-(3).

(1)
$$I_{d 2}=g_{m 1_{2}} V_{g s_{2}}+g_{m 2_{2}} V^{2}_{g s_{2}}+g_{m 3_{2}} V_{g s_{2}}^{3}$$

(2)
$$I_{d 3}=g_{m 1_{3}} (-V_{g s_{3}})+g_{m 2_{3}} (-V_{g s_{3}})^{2}+g_{m 2_{3}} (-V_{g s_{3}})^{3}$$

(3)
$$\begin{aligned} I_{d_{\text {total }}}\left(V_{1}\right)=& I_{d 2}+I_{d 3}=\left(g_{m 1_{2}} V_{g s_{2}}+g_{m 2_{2}} V_{g s_{2}}^{2}+g_{m 3_{2}} V_{g s_{2}}^{3}\right) \\ &+g_{m 1_{3}}\left(-V_{g s_{3}}\right)+g_{m 2_{3}}\left(-V_{g s_{3}}\right)^{2}+g_{m 2_{3}}\left(-V_{g s_{3}}\right)^{3} \end{aligned}$$

Since $V_{gs3}$ is a function of $V_{gs2}$, it is expressed to power series of $V_{gs2}$ as expressed by Eq. (4).

(4)
$$V_{gs3}=c_{1}V_{g s_{2}}+c_{2}V^{2}_{g s_{2}}+c_{3}V^{3}_{g s_{2}}$$

where $C_{i}S$ are generally frequency dependent. In practice, the π-network cancels the effects of $c_{2}$ and $c_{3}$ at the frequency of interest. To find the coefficient $C_{i}S$, we should solve the equation after expanding $I_{d_{total}}$ as a power series of $V_{gs2}$ and replacing it with Eq. (4), and then we obtain Eq. (5) (4).

(5)
$$\begin{aligned} I_{d_{total}} &=I_{d 3}+I_{d 2} \\ & \cong\left(g_{m 1_{3}}+c_{1} g_{m 1_{2}}\right) V_{b 3}+\left(g_{m 2_{3}}+c_{1}^{2} g_{m 2_{2}}\right) V_{b 3}^{2}+\left(g_{m 3_{3}}+c_{1}^{3} g_{m 3_{2}}\right) V_{b 3}^{3} \end{aligned}$$

where $g_{m1}$, $g_{m2}$ and $g_{m3}$ are the main transconductance, second-order and third-order nonlinearity coefficients, respectively (4). The second order nonlinearity is canceled in output due to cut off phase signal by NMOS and PMOS. The optimum biasing is used to obtain a high IIP3 by reducing the total $g_{m3}$, and the IIP3 can be calculated by Eq. (6) (8).

(6)
$$A_{I I P 3}=\sqrt{\frac{3 g_{m1}}{4 g_{m3}}}$$

The $g_{m3,d3}$ changes from positive to negative when the transistor moves from weak to strong inversion region. In other words, by changing gate bias voltage of PMOS transistor, the parameter $C_{1}$ can be varied. It can be deduced from Eq. (4).

2.3 Small Signal Analysis

Fig. 4 shows simplified high-frequency small signal model of cascade topology with inductively degenerated scheme for the LNA. By applying the KCL at source node, we obtain Eq. (7).

(7)
$$c_{g s}=C_{g d}=\frac{C_{ox} W L}{2}=C_{g c}\left(V_{s}=V_{d}\right)$$

where W and L represent the transistor’s width and length, respectively, and $C_{ox}$ is gate capacitance per unit area.

By applying the KCL at drain node $d_{1}$ of $M_{1}$, we get Eqs. (8)-(13).

(8)
$$\left(V_{d 1}-V_{g 1}\right) j w C_{g d 1}+g_{m 1} V_{g s 1}+\frac{\left(V_{d 1}-V_{s 1}\right)}{r_{0}}+\frac{\left(V_{d 1}-V_{s 2}\right)}{j w L_{3}}=0$$

(9)
$$\left(V_{d 1}-V_{g 1}\right) j w C_{g d 1}+g_{m 1} V_{g s 1}+\frac{V_{d s1}}{r_{0}}+\frac{\left(V_{d 1}-V_{s 2}\right)}{j w L_{3}}=0$$

(10)
$$\begin{array}{l} \left(V_{d 1}-V_{g 1}\right)\left(-\mathrm{w}^{2} L_{3} C_{g d 1}\right) r_{0}+j w L_{3} r_{0} g_{m 1} V_{g s 1}+j w L_{3} V_{d s 1} \\ +r_{0}\left(V_{d 1}-V_{s 2}\right)=0 \end{array}$$

(11)
$$\begin{array}{l} V_{d 1}\left[-w^{2} L_{3} r_{0} C_{g d 1}+r_{0}\right]+V_{g 1} w^{2} L_{3} r_{0} C_{g d 1}-r_{0} V_{s 2} \\ +j w L_{3} V_{d s 1}+j w L_{3} r_{0} g_{m 1} V_{g s 1}=0 \end{array}$$

(12)
$$\begin{array}{l} V_{d 1}\left[-w^{2} L_{3} r_{0} C_{g d 1}+r_{0}\right]+V_{g 1} w^{2} L_{3} r_{0} C_{g d 1}-r_{0} V_{s 2}+j w L_{3} V_{d 1} \\ -j w L_{3} V_{s 1}+j w L_{3} r_{0} g_{m 1} V_{g 1}-j w L_{3} r_{0} g_{m 1} V_{s 1}=0 \end{array}$$

(13)
$$\begin{aligned} &V_{d 1}\left[-w^{2} L_{3} r_{0} C_{g d 1}+r_{0}+j w L_{3}\right]+V_{g 1}\left[w^{2} L_{3} r_{0} C_{g d 1}+\right.\\ &\left.j w L_{3} r_{0} g_{m 1}\right]+V_{s 1}\left[-j w L_{3}-j w L_{3} r_{0} g_{m 1}\right]-r_{0} V_{s 2}=0 \end{aligned}$$

Fig. 4. High-frequency small signal model for the LNA.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.2.187/fig4.png

Now let’s analyze the input impedance of the cascade topology using inductive source degeneration technique. The transistor $M_{1}$ is replaced by a high-frequency small-signal model consisting of gate-source capacitor $C_{gs1}$, gate-drain capacitor $C_{gd1}$, $g_{m1}$ and source degeneration inductor $L_{1}$. By applying the KCL at source node $s_{1}$, we also obtain Eqs. (14)-(16).

(14)
$$I_{i n}=\frac{V_{s 1}}{R_{i n}}+\frac{V_{s 1}}{j w L_{1}}-g_{m 1} V_{g s 1}-\frac{V_{d s 1}}{r_{0}}-V_{d s 1} j w\left(\frac{c_{g d 1} c_{g s 1}}{c_{g d 1}+c_{g s 1}}\right)$$

(15)
$$I_{i n}=V_{s 1}\left(\frac{1}{R_{i n}}+\frac{1}{j w L_{1}}\right)-g_{m 1} V_{g s 1}-V_{d s 1} \frac{1}{r_{0}}+j w\left(\frac{c_{g d 1} c_{g s 1}}{c_{g d 1}+c_{g s 1}}\right)$$

(16)
$$\begin{aligned} I_{i n}=& V_{s 1}\left[\frac{1}{R_{i n}}+\frac{1}{j w L_{1}}+g_{m 1}+\frac{1}{r_{o}}+j w\left(\frac{C_{g d 1} C_{g s 1}}{C_{g d 1}+C_{g s 1}}\right)\right] \\ &-g_{m 1} V_{g 1}-V_{d 1}\left[\frac{1}{r_{0}}+j w\left(\frac{c_{g d 1} c_{g s 1}}{c_{g d 1}+c_{g s 1}}\right)\right] \end{aligned}$$

For AC analysis, $C_{in}$ can be shorted, and by neglecting the term $V_{d1}$ and $V_{g1}$, and using Eqs. (14) and (15), we obtain Eqs. (17) and (18). $V_{in}$=$V_{s1}$ by inserting this value and rearranging, so the input impedance $Z_{in}$ is expressed by Eq. (19).

(17)
$$I_{i n}=V_{i n}\left[\frac{1}{R_{i n}}+\frac{1}{j w L_{1}}+g_{m 1}+\frac{1}{r_{o}}+j w\left(\frac{c_{g d 1} c_{g s 1}}{c_{g d_{1}}+c_{g s 1}}\right)\right]$$

(18)
$$ \frac{V_{in}}{I_{i n}}=Z_{i n}$$

(19)
$$Z_{i n}=\frac{1}{\left[\frac{1}{R_{i n}}+\frac{1}{j w L_{1}}+g_{m 1}+\frac{1}{r_{0}}+j w\left(\frac{c_{g d_{1}} c_{g s 1}}{\left.c_{g d 1}+c_{g s 1}\right)}\right)\right]}$$

where $Z_{in}$ and output impedance $Z_{out}$ of each stage are optimized at 24 GHz, and we can simplify Eq. (19) into Eq. (20).

(20)
$$Z_{i n}=R_{i n} / / X_{L 1} / / \frac{1}{g_{m 1}} / / r_{0} / / X_{C}$$

where $X_{L1}$ and $X_{C}=\frac{1}{j w\left(\frac{c_{g d_{1}} c_{g s 1}}{c_{g d_{1}}+c_{g s 1}}\right)}$

By assuming $r_{0}=∞$, we get the simplified form of $Z_{in}$as shown below.

(21)
$$Z_{i n}=R_{i n} / / X_{L 1} / / \frac{1}{g_{m 1}} / / X_{C}$$

On deactivating the input source $V_{in}$ and applying KCL at the output node, we can get output impedance $Z_{out}$. At the input node $s_{1}$, we also obtain Eqs. (22) and (23).

(22)
$$I_{s 1}=g_{m 1} V_{g s 1}+\frac{V_{d s 1}}{r_{0}}+V_{d s 1} j w\left(\frac{c_{g d_{1}} c_{g s 1}}{c_{g d 1}+c_{g s 1}}\right)$$

(23)
$$V_{s 1}=I_{s 1}\left(\frac{R_{i n} j w L_{1}}{R_{i n}+j w L_{1}}\right)$$

By applying KCL at the output node $d_{4}$, inserting $V_{d4}$=$V_{out}$, and rearranging, we get Eqs. (24)-(26).

(24)
$$\frac{V_{\text {out }}-V_{s 4}}{r_{0}}+g_{m 4} V_{g s 4}+\left[\left(\frac{R_{\text {out }}+j w L_{\text {out }} \frac{1}{j w C_{\text {gd4 }}}}{R_{\text {out }}+j w L_{\text {out }}+\frac{1}{j w C_{\text {gd4 }}}}\right)+\frac{1}{j w C_{g s t}}\right]\left(V_{\text {out }}-V_{s 4}\right)$$

(25)
$$\frac{V_{o u t}}{r_{o}}+V_{o u t}\left[\left(\frac{R_{o u t}+j w L_{o u t} \frac{1}{j w c_{g d 4}}}{R_{o u t}+j w L_{o u t}+\frac{1}{j w C_{g d 4}}}\right)+\frac{1}{j w c_{g s 4}}\right]=I_{o u t}$$

(26)
$$Z_{\text {out}}=\left[\frac{1}{r_{o}}+\frac{R_{\text {out}}+j w L_{\text {out}}}{j w C_{\text {gd4}}\left(R_{\text {out}}+j w L_{\text {out}}\right)+1}+\frac{1}{j w c_{g s 4}}\right]^{-1}$$

(27)
$$Z_{\text {out}}=\left[\frac{1}{r_{0}}+\frac{1}{j w C_{g d 4}+G_{\text {out}}}+\frac{1}{j w C_{g s 4}}\right]^{-1}$$

where $G_{\text {out}}=\frac{1}{R_{\text {out}}+j w L_{\text {out}}}$, by assuming $r_{0}=∞$, we obtained the simplified form of $Z_{out}$ as shown in Eq. (28).

(28)
$$Z_{\text {out}}=\frac{j w c_{g s 4}\left(j w c_{g d 4}+G_{o u t}\right)}{j w\left(c_{g d 4}+c_{g s 4}\right)+G_{o u t}}$$

Now let’s get voltage gain. From the voltage and current of transistors $M_{1}$, $M_{2}$, $M_{3}$ and $M_{4}$, we also obtain Eqs. (29)-(35).

(29)
$$V_{s 2}=V_{d 1}-I_{d 1, d 2} j w L_{3}$$

(30)
$$V_{d1}=I_{ds1}r_{o1}+V_{s1}$$

(31)
$$V_{d4}=I_{ds4}r_{o4}+V_{s4}=V_{out}$$

(32)
$$V_{d1}=I_{ds1}r_{o1}+V_{in}$$

(33)
$$V_{s2}=I_{ds1}r_{o1}+V_{in}-I_{d1,d2}jwL_{3}$$

(34)
$$V_{s3}=I_{ds1}r_{o1}+V_{in}-I_{d1,d2}jwL_{3}$$

(35)
$$V_{d3}=I_{ds3}r_{o3}+V_{s3}$$

By rearranging Eqs. (29) and (35), we get Eqs. (36)-(38).

(36)
$$V_{d3}=I_{ds3}r_{o3}+I_{ds1}r_{o1}+V_{in}-I_{d1,d2}jwL_{3}$$

(37)
$$V_{d4}=I_{ds3}r_{o3}+I_{ds1}r_{o1}+V_{in}-I_{d1,d2}jwL_{3}$$

(38)
$$V_{out}=I_{ds1}r_{o1}+V_{in}-I_{d1,d2}jwL_{3}+I_{d32}r_{o3}+I_{ds4}r_{o4}$$

The voltage gain of the LNA should be much larger to reduce the noise figure. From high-frequency small signal model as shown in Fig. 4, we also obtain Eqs. (39)-(41).

(39)
$$A_{v 1}=g_{m 1}\left(jwL_{3} / / r_{o2} / / r_{o 1}\right)$$

(40)
$$A_{v 3}=g_{m 3}\left(r_{o 3} / / \frac{1}{g_{m 4}} / / r_{o 4}\right)$$

(41)
$$A_{v 4}=g_{m 4}\left(r_{o4} / / R_{out}+jwL_{out}\right)$$

If we assume that $r_{o1}=r_{o2}=r_{o3}=r_{o4}=r_{o}$, voltage gain is expressed by Eq. (42).

(42)
$$r_{o1}=r_{o2}=r_{o3}=r_{o4}=r_{o})$$

By assuming $r_{0}=∞$, therefore we get Eq. (43).

(43)
$$A_{v}=g_{m 1} g_{m 3} g_{m 4}\left(R_{o u t}+j w L_{o u t}\right) \lim _{r_{0-\infty}}\left(\frac{j w L_{3} r_{0}}{2 j w L_{3}+r_{0}}\right) \lim _{r_{0-\infty}}\left(\frac{r_{0}}{2+r_{0} g_{m 4}}\right)$$

Eq. (43) is also simplified as described in Eqs. (44) and (45).

(44)
$$A_{v}=g_{m 1} g_{m 3} g_{m 4}\left(R_{o u t}+j w L_{o u t}\right) \left(\frac{jwL_{3}}{g_{m 4}}\right)$$

(45)
$$A_{v}=G_{T} \left(R_{o u t}+X_{o u t}\right) \left(X_{L3}\right)$$

where $X_{Lout}$= $j_{ω}L_{out}$, $X_{L3}$ = $j_{ω}L_{3}$ and $G_{T}$ = $g_{ml}g_{m3}$.

The noise figure ($NF$) in LNA determines the inherent LNA noise added to the desired or wanted signal during the process of amplification. $NF$ is a function of source admittance looking into the input terminal of the two-port network. To achieve the $NF_{min}$, an optimum source admittance that results in minimum noise figure, namely $Y_{opt}$, should be introduced to the network. The expressions for $NF_{min}$ and $Y_{opt}$ can be derived for a MOS device by considering a two-port network model for the MOS device. In this model the gate-source terminal is the input port, and the drain-source terminal is the output port. When source admittance presented to transistor ($Y_{s}$) is matched at $Y_{opt}$, the NF has almost $NF_{min}$ (11,12).

Fig. 5. Die photograph of the proposed LNA.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.2.187/fig5.png

2.4 Layout Issues

The circuits are designed and fabricated using 65 nm RF CMOS technology. This technology offers six metal layers with two top layers of 0.6$\mu \mathrm{m}$ thick copper. Shield pads for inductors are employed at each port. Fig. 5 shows die photograph of the proposed LNA. Grounded metal underneath the pads prevents loss of the signal power and noise generation associated with the substrate resistance. Ground rings are placed around each transistor at minimum distance to reduce the substrate loss. To minimize parasitic capacitance all transistors are designed by folded structure (9). Signal lines were wide enough to meet electro-migration requirements. Ground lines were made wide to provide low impedance paths. The decoupling capacitor was added to bypass high frequency noise from the bias voltage. Grounded guard ring with substrate connection surrounds the inductor to minimize substrate noise. The MIM capacitors are used for high quality factors and the resistors of tantalum nitride thin film are used. Large on-chip bypass capacitors are placed between each $V_{DD}$and ground. The die occupies 0.60${\times}$0.60 mm$^{2}$ including pads and 0.31${\times}$0.35 mm$^{2}$ without pads.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

The input and output pads are laid out in GSG configuration with a pitch of 50$\mu \mathrm{m}$ to perform wafer level testing for LNA using a probe station with network analyzer. We performed 2-port measurements. The measurements are based on a separate LNA test chip. The power of ${-}$20 dBm is applied from the synthesized sources at both port 1 and port 2. We applied the attenuators of 0 dB at both port1 and port2.

Fig. 6. (a) Return losses ($S_{11}$, $S_{22}$), (b) reverse isolation ($S_{12}$).

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.2.187/fig6.png

Obviously, downscaling of CMOS technologies has significant impact on the design of analog and radio frequency circuits. Particularly, in low supply voltage circuits, as the technology downscales, the available voltage headroom decreases, and so it makes the design procedure difficult. Additionally, since the voltage headroom is smaller, the low power consumption in wireless and electronic portable devices and applications is becoming more important. In analog and RF blocks, high output power with high efficiency is desirable, but with the above-mentioned limitations on the recent technologies, achieving these goals requires special attention on the designing circuits with new techniques and topologies. From Fig. 2 and 3, the proposed LNA showed total dc current of 3.825 mA at 1.2 V supply, so we obtained the lowest power consumption of 4.59 mW as compared to conventional results (13-17).

Fig. 6 shows (a) input and output return losses (S$_{11}$, S$_{22}$), and (b) reverse isolation (S$_{12}$). Input and output impedance matching is so important to obtain low input and output return losses. Ideal input and output impedances of the amplifier must have 45${\sim}$50 Ω at the operation frequency. As shown in Fig. 6, the LNA showed very low input return loss of -32.8 dB, very low output return loss of -32.7 dB, and very low reverse isolation of -47 dB as compared to conventional results (13-17).

Fig. 7. Voltage gain ($S_{21}$).

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.2.187/fig7.png

Fig. 8. Noise figure.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.2.187/fig8.png

Voltage gain is very important parameter in GHz-band LNA. Fig. 7 shows voltage gain ($A_{v}$). From the proposed circuit, ${\Gamma}$$_{L}$ = ${\Gamma}$$_{in}$ ${\approx}$ 0, so it has value of $A_{v}$${\approx}$ S$_{21}$ (11,12). As shown in Fig. 7, the proposed LNA showed very high voltage gain of 24.3 dB at the operation frequency of 24~GHz as compared to conventional results (13-16).

Fig. 8 shows noise figure. Noise figure is measurement factor of degradation of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as the incoming signal from antenna traverses the receiver frontend. Mathematically, noise figure is defined as the ratio of the input SNR to the output SNR of the system. To reduce noise figure, $Y_{s}$ is matched at $Y_{opt}$ in the proposed amplifier. As shown in Fig. 8, the proposed LNA showed very low noise figure of 2.98 dB as compared to conventional results (13-17).

To verify performance of the proposed LNA, we carried out simulations using ADS and layout using Cadence, and calculation is extracted using high-frequency small signal equivalent model.

Table 1. Comparison summary for recently reported research results

Parameters

This Work

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

Frequency

(GHz)

24

24

24

24

24

Technology

(μm)

CMOS

0.13

CMOS

0.13

CMOS

0.18

CMOS

0.18

BiCMOS

0.17

Supply voltage (V)

1.2

1.2

1

-

1.2

Voltage gain

(dB)

24.3

-

13.1

18.19

22.5

$S_{11}$/$S_{22}$ (dB)

-32.8/

-32.7

-9.5

-18

-25

-12/

-13

Power consumption

(mW)

4.59

15

14

11.3

42

IIP3 (dBm)

3.2

-

0.54

-16.5

-15.5

Noise figure

(dB)

2.98

3.8

3.9

5.8

3.2

Die area

(mm$^{2}$)

0.31×

0.35

1.7×

1.2

0.57×

0.6

0.94×

0.5

2.29×

0.97

The performance summary of the proposed LNA is compared in Table 1. As can be seen from Table 1, the proposed LNA showed the lowest power consumption of 4.59 mW, the highest voltage gain of 24.3 dB, and the lowest noise figure of 2.98 dB as compared to conventional results (13-16). It also has the smallest die size 0.31${\times}$0.35 mm$^{2}$ without pads as compared to recently reported research results (13-16).

IV. CONCLUSIONS

In this paper, we proposed low-power low-noise 24-GHz CMOS LNA for automotive collision avoidance radar. This circuit is implemented in 65 nm RF CMOS process. To increase voltage gain and decrease power consumption, we utilized cascode inductive source degeneration technique. The LNA was optimized by minimization of the inherent LNA noise added to the desired or wanted signal during the process of amplification to reduce noise figure. The proposed LNA showed total dc current of 3.825 mA at 1.2 V supply, so we obtained the lowest power consumption of 4.59 mW as compared to conventional results. It also showed the lowest noise figure of 2.98 dB, high voltage gain of 24.3~dB, good S-parameter results and small die size 0.31${\times}$0.35 mm$^{2}$ without pads as compared to recently reported research results.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2018R1D1A1B07043286).

REFERENCES

1 
Noh S.-H., Ryu J.-Y., October 2017, Linearity Enhancement Technique for GHz-Band LNA, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Vol. 12, No. 19, pp. 9116-9119Google Search
2 
Rastegar H., Ryu J.-Y., October 2016, An Integrated High Linearity CMOS Receiver Frontend for 24-GHz Applications, Journal of Semiconductor Technology and Science, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 595-604Google Search
3 
Rastegar H., Ryu J.-Y., August 2015, A Broadband Low Noise Amplifier with Built-in Linearizer in 0.13-μm CMOS Process, Microelectronics Journal, Vol. 46, No. 8, pp. 698-705DOI
4 
Chen W.-H., Liu G., Zdravko B., Niknejad A. M., pp 1164-1176 May 2008, A Highly Linear Broadband CMOS LNA Employing Noise and Distortion Cancellation, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Cciruits, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 1164-1176DOI
5 
Rastegar H., Lim J.-H., Ryu J.-Y., August 2016, A 2GHz 20dBm IIP3 Low-Power CMOS LNA with Modified DS Linearization Technique, Journal of Semiconductor Technology and Science, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 443-450Google Search
6 
Noh S.-H., Ryu J.-Y., October 2013, Design of 24GHz Low Noise Amplifier for Short Range Radar of Automotive Collision Avoidance, Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, Vol. 11, No. 10, pp. 23-28Google Search
7 
Kim S.-W., Ryu J.-Y., July 2012, Design of 24GHz Low Noise Amplifier for Automotive Radar, Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, Vol. 10, No. 7, pp. 41-47Google Search
8 
Zhang H., Sánchez-Sinencio E., January 2011, Linearization Techniques for CMOS Low Noise Amplifiers: A Tutorial., IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 22-36DOI
9 
Mu L., Qian T. X., Ming S., Jun Y., June 2009, Research on Key Technologies for Collision Avoidance Automotive Radar, 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 233-236DOI
10 
Lee J.-H., Ryu J.-Y., Kim S.-W., Noh S.-H., July 2012 , Design of Radio Frequency Front-End for 77GHz Automotive Collision Avoidance Radar, Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, Vol. 10, No. 7, pp. 13-19Google Search
11 
Razavi B., 2001, Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USAGoogle Search
12 
Razavi B., 1998, RF Microelectronics, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, pp. 11-18Google Search
13 
Debski W., Winkler W., Genschow D., Kraemer R., June 2011, 24 GHz Transceiver Front-end with Integrated Ramp Generator, IEEE Proceedings of the 6th European Microwave Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 233-236Google Search
14 
Shin S.-C., Tsai M.-D., Liu R.-C., Lin K.-Y., Wang H., August 2005, A 24-GHz 3.9-dB NF Low-noise Amplifier using 0.18 µm CMOS Technology., IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, Vol. 15, No. 7, pp. 448-450DOI
15 
Lin C.-Y., Lin M.-W., Liang C.-P., Chung S.-J., January 2012, A 24 GHz Low-power and High-gain Low-noise Amplifier Using 0.18µm CMOS Technology for FMCW Radar Applications, pp. 892-896Google Search
16 
Pruvost S., Moquillon L., Imbs E., Marchetti M., Garcia P., June 2007, Low Noise Low Cost Rx Solutions for Pulsed 24GHz Automotive Radar Sensors, 2007 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, pp. 387-390DOI
17 
Yoon M., Ryu J.-Y., August 2016, Development of Low-Noise Small-Area 24GHz CMOS Radar Sensor, Journal of Sensors, Vol. 2016, No. 8, pp. 1-12DOI

Author

Murod Kurbanov
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.2.187/au1.png

Murod Kurbanov, received the BS in electronics engineering from Tashkent University of Information Technologies, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, in 2012, and the MS degree in information and communication engineering from Pukyong National University, Busan Korea, in 2017.

He is currently taking the PhD degree in information and communications engineering from Pukyong National University.

His current research interests include the design and testing of RF integrated circuits and the design and testing of System-on-Chip.

Jee-Youl Ryu
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.2.187/au2.png

Jee-Youl Ryu, received the BS and MS degrees in electronics engi-neering from Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea, in 1993 and 1997, respectively, and the PhD degree in electrical engineering from Arizona State University, Tempe, in December 2004.

He is currently a professor at Pukyong National University.

His current research interests include the design and testing of System-on-Chip, the design and testing of RF integrated circuits, and the design of embedded system.