Mobile QR Code QR CODE

  1. School of Semiconductor and Chemical Engineering, Semiconductor Physics Research Center (SPRC), Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
  2. Department of Physics, School of Engineering, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru 560068, India
  3. R&D Division, Sigetronics, Inc., Jeonju 55314, Republic of Korea



Ga2O3 , Cu2O, heterojunction, PN diodes, breakdown voltage

I. INTRODUCTION

Ultrawide bandgap (UWB) semiconductors exhibit great promise in maintaining higher voltages and better conversion efficiency for modern industrial and electronic products since they are able to sustain higher critical fields, allowing for higher blocking voltages at lower resistances [1]. Beta-gallium oxide (β-Ga2O3) has attracted significant interest as a highly promising ultrawide bandgap material with immense potential in the field of power semiconductors devices. Owing to its large bandgap of 4.8 eV, high critical electric field of 8 MV/cm, and high Baliga’s figure of merit of 3400, Ga2O3 became an excellent candidate for high-power applications, outperforming semiconductors like Si, GaN, and SiC [2- 4]. Despite the materials inherent capability, the current performance of the Ga2O3 based Schottky diodes, in particular the demonstrative device’s parameter power figure-of-merit (PFOM) remains significantly lower than the projected material’s limits. In β-Ga2O3 Schottky diodes, the high surface electric field at the Schottky contacts induce excessive leakage currents resulting in premature breakdown of the device. Further, the defects at the metal/β-Ga2O3 interface introduced during the fabrication processing steps may result in large reverse leakage currents under large reverse electrical fields. A suppression of the reverse leakage current and enhancement in the breakdown voltage can be attained employing a variety of field management techniques like field plates, trench type structures and injection termination structures [5- 9]. Additionally, the lack of an efficient p-type doping technique for Ga2O3 is severely limiting the development of advanced Ga2O3 bipolar power electronics and as well for potential optoelectronic device applications using p-n junction structures [10- 13]. This obstacle can be overcome by an alternative approach of constructing p-n junctions employing p-type oxide semiconductors and n-type Ga2O3. Li et al. [2] fabricated NiO/Ga2O3 vertical heterojunctions and achieved remarkable breakdown voltage of 13.5 kV signifying the importance of p-type NiO in forming Ga2O3-based p-n junctions. for high power device applications. This approach allows the formation of various heterojunction devices with enhanced electrical performance, including p-n heterojunction diodes (HJD) [14], heterojunction barrier Schottky diodes (HJBS) [15] heterojunction field-effect transistors (JFET) [16- 18] and super junction metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (SJ-MOSFET) [19]. NiO is a superior p-type partner for Ga2O3 in high-power applications owing to its wide bandgap and superior breakdown voltage. While Cu2O offers significant advantages in cost, ease of fabrication, and specific optoelectronic applications. Cu2O is particularly advantageous for applications requiring high-efficiency visible light absorption and offers a more accessible, earth-abundant material set. To approach a 13.5 kV breakdown voltage in a Cu2O/Ga2O3 structure as reported by Li et al. [2] for NiO/Ga2O3 based devices, the drift layer thickness must be increased to 17–18 μm and the doping concentration need to be approximately $8.8\times 10^{15}\text{ cm}^{-3}$. Practical limitations with Cu2O include its narrower bandgap which increases leakage current, and the critical need for advanced edge termination to manage the massive electric fields at the device boundaries. Nevertheless, NiO possesses a much wider bandgap, superior thermal and chemical stability compared to Cu2O, with the defect generation and migration under high electric fields are relatively suppressed in NiO making it advantageous for achieving a higher critical electric field and thus a higher breakdown voltage. In contrast, Cu2O has a narrower bandgap and a higher sensitivity to defects limiting the attainabl e breakdown voltage under identical processing conditions. Approaching the performance level of NiO-based heterojunctions using Cu2O would need advanced device engineering techniques like careful design of electric-field management schemes, multilayer band-step architectures and extension of the drift region. Based on recent research, Cu2O/Ga2O3 heterojunction diodes, particularly in Junction Barrier Schottky or p-n heterojunction structures, exhibit superior reverse recovery times and switching losses compared to conventional Ga2O3 Schottky Barrier Diodes (SBDs) due to charge storage effects associated with interfacial and bulk trap states often leading to higher performances. They leverage a high-barrier p-type material to reduce leakage current while maintaining low on-state resistance. While, the NiO/Ga2O3 structure benefits from relatively lower trap activity and a wider bandgap, which leads to more favorable reverse recovery characteristics and reduced switching losses. The Cu2O/Ga2O3 heterojunctions are more suitable for medium-voltage, cost-sensitive applications rather than ultra-high-frequency applications. However, owing to the intrinsic material property limitations of Cu2O, there remains practical constraints on achieving full parity with NiO/β-Ga2O3-based devices and needs intensive research. Till now, the Ga2O3-based p-n heterojunction devices formed employing p-type NiO demonstrated high breakdown voltages and the formation of p-n heterojunction devices with p-type Cu2O could be highly promising resulting in higher breakdown voltages.

Recently, various p-type oxide materials such like Cr2O3 [20, 21], ZnCo2O4 [22], NiO [23- 25], SnO [26, 27] and Cu2O [28] have been successfully employed in the fabrication of the β-Ga2O3-based heterojunction diodes. So far, there have been several reports available on the fabrication of Ga2O3-based p-n heterojunction diodes with improved electrical performance [20- 31]. Among the several p-type oxide materials, Cu2O with an energy bandgap of 2.1 eV is one of the most promising materials with an intrinsic p-type conductivity owing to the creation of an acceptor level above the valence band maximum associated with the negatively charged Cu vacancies [28, 29]. Watahiki et al. [28] fabricated p-Cu2O/n-β-Ga2O3 diode and reported a reverse breakdown voltage of 1.49 kV with a specific on-resistance of 8.2 mΩ·cm2. Wang et al. [32] reported a notable breakdown voltage of 2.86 kV for Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction diode employing a stepped double-layer (SDL) structure of Cu2O. The diode exhibited a turn-on voltage of 1.2 V, a specific on-resistance of 8.1 mΩ·cm2, a power figure-of-merit exceeding 1.0 GW/cm2 and operates normally to temperatures up to 473 K implying its thermal stability. Jia et al. [33] fabricated the vertical Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction p–n diodes with Cu2O films deposited employing magnetron sputtering at substrate temperature of 600 °C demonstrated superior performance compared to devices fabricated with polycrystalline Cu2O thin films and exhibited a breakdown voltage of 1015 V. Takatsuka et al. [34] demonstrated Ga2O3 trench heterojunction barrier Schottky diodes using a p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction structure with a maximum current of 3.5 A and breakdown voltage of 986 V. Jiang et al. [35] fabricated Cu2O/Zr-doped β-Ga2O3 heterojunction diode that exhibited a near-ideal electrical behavior with a low ideality factor of 1.6 and that Zr doping markedly enhanced the crystallinity of Ga2O3 at low substrate temperatures with a transformation of the amorphous structure of pristine Ga2O3 films into the crystallized β phase. Despite the availability of the reports on the Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diodes, it is of high importance to thoroughly understand the effect of the doping concentration and thickness of the p-type Cu2O layer on the electrical characteristics of the Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode, in particular towards enhancing the breakdown voltage and the on-resistance that determines the performance of the high-power device. Following the recent 2025 reports by pearton et al. [13] and, in particular, studies published near the timeframe of the Pearton et al. 2025 review on β-Ga2O3, the optimized Cu2O/Ga2O3 heterojunction diode showed a Power Figure-of-Merit ($\text{PFOM}=V^2/R_{on}$) around 0.49–1.2 GW/cm2 makes it competitive with other p-type oxides. Till now, the NiO/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode currently hold the highest PFOM reported record for the material system often exceeding 5–9 GW/cm2. The optimized Cu2O/Ga2O3 HJDs with a careful device engineering could lead to a very favourable balance of high voltage and low resistance, placing them as a top alternative in the p-type oxide/Ga2O3 based p-n heterojunction systems.

In this work, we investigated the performance of the Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode by varying the parameters such as bandgap, electron affinity, doping concentration and thickness of the p-type Cu2O layer. We have performed an extensive and systematic investigation on the impact of these parameters on the electrical and breakdown voltage characteristics and the electric field distribution under the anode contact edge of the Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode employing commercial technology computer-aided design (TCAD) software Silvaco Atlas. These simulations have been carried out towards achieving an enhancement in breakdown voltage of the Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode and its optimization. It is shown that the breakdown voltage increased with increase in doping concentration of the p-type Cu2O layer until $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ and remained constant for $1\times 10^{19}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ implying that the depletion width of the drift layer determined by the doping concentration has reached its limit at $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ thus limiting the voltage that the drift layer can withstand. Further, the breakdown voltage of the Cu2O layer with doping concentration of $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ increased with increase in the thickness until 200 nm after which the breakdown voltage is noted to be unchanged. A detailed discussion on the effect of doping concentration and thickness of the p-type Cu2O layer on the Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode performance has been provided.

II. SIMULATION DETAIL

Fig. 1 shows the schematic cross-section of the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction p-n diode used in the simulation. A highly doped n+ Ga2O3 substrate with a doping concentration of $1\times 10^{19}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ is used to form an n− β-Ga2O3 epitaxial layer having a doping concentration of $2\times 10^{16}\text{ cm}^{-3}$, upon which p-type Cu2O thin films with various doping concentrations and thicknesses are deposited. For the convenience of the simulation, the thicknesses of the n+ Ga2O3 substrate and n− Ga2O3 epitaxial layer were set to 1 μm and 10 μm, respectively. The simulation was conducted using a 2D device simulator and Atlas Technology computer aided design (TCAD) software. To simulate the electrical characteristics of the device, the thermionic current model, Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) recombination model, and band-to-band tunneling model were employed. For simulating the breakdown voltage characteristics, the impact ionization model was employed. The physical parameters of Ga2O3, including bandgap, electron affinity, relative dielectric constant, and carrier mobility, are summarized in Table 1. In contrast, the physical parameters of Cu2O were obtained from calibrated values extracted from previously reported experimental data.

Fig. 1. Schematic of p-type Cu2O/n-type β-Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode used for simulation.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/fig1.png

Table 1. Material parameters used for simulation.

Material

Ga2O3

Cu2O

Band gap (eV)

4.8

2.0

Electron affinity (eV)

4.0

3.6

Relative dielectric constant

10

7

Electron mobility (cm2/Vs)

300

Hole mobility (cm2/Vs)

80

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Fig. 2 illustrates the simulated current density (J)–voltage (V) characteristics of the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction in response to variations in the bandgap and electron affinity of Cu2O. As the bandgap of Cu2O increased from 1 eV to 3 eV, the turn-on voltage increased from 0.7 V to 2.7 V. This is because an increase in the bandgap of the semiconductor increases the energy barrier formed at the p-n junction leading to a requirement of high turn-on voltage to enable conduction in the diode allowing significant current flow [36, 37]. Additionally, as well known, a conduction band offset is generated when different semiconductors form a heterojunction given by the electron affinity difference between the semiconductors. A larger conduction band offset ($\Delta E_C$) is formed at the p-type Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 interface that act as a barrier to electron injection from n-Ga2O3 to p-Cu2O, reducing forward current and increasing turn-on voltage, reducing injection efficiency. To attain high injection efficiency, $\Delta E_C$ need to be relatively low to allow high forward currents, while still allowing the heterojunction to function. $\Delta E_C$ can be minimized by utilizing a junction barrier structure with a periodic Cu2O pattern on β-Ga2O3 leading to a low turn-on voltage via the Schottky junctions while the p-type Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction blocks the reverse leakage current. $\Delta E_C$ can be reduced by inserting a thin buffer layer between Cu2O and β-Ga2O3 and also, by tuning the oxygen concentration in the Cu2O during deposition thus tuning the p-type carrier concentration and reduce oxygen vacancy-related defects, thereby improving the band alignment. The variation of electron affinity for Cu2O between 3.0 eV and 4.0 eV in simulations accounts for the significant impact of surface states, stoichiometry, and intrinsic defects on the material's energy levels. Pure Cu2O usually exhibits an electron affinity near 3.2 eV with the experimental values shifting as the material deviates toward CuO or Cu4O3 mixed phases. Higher oxygen flow during deposition can alter the conduction band minimum effectively shifting electron affinity across the simulated range. Cu2O is intrinsically p-type due to copper vacancies ($V_{Cu}$), but oxygen vacancies ($V_O$) are also usual. $V_O$ acts as a shallow donor that can introduce localized states near the CBM, leading to band gap narrowing. This defect-driven shifting of the CBM directly justifies exploring a wider electron affinity range to capture realistic electronic environments. Form Fig. 2(b), it can be noted that as the electron affinity of Cu2O was varied from 3.0 eV to 4.0 eV, the on-resistance of the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction p-n diode is decreased from 41.2 MΩ·cm2 to 0.815 mΩ·cm2. In general, the on-resistance of a p-n junction diode decreases with increasing electron affinity of the p-type layer. This is associated with the fact that a higher electron affinity of the p-type material results in a lower potential barrier at the junction allowing increased current flow and lower resistance on forward biasing. This indicates that by altering the bandgap and electron affinity, it is possible to control the turn-on voltage and on-resistance. The crystallinity of Cu2O exhibits a direct impact on carrier mobility and interfacial defect density that effects the forward on-voltage and leakage current characteristics. In usual, the polycrystalline Cu2O exhibits lower mobility and higher leakage current due to grain-boundary scattering and a higher density of defects. While the epitaxial or highly crystalline Cu2O alleviates these non-ideal effects. As the deposition temperature increases, the crystallinity of Cu2O improves; however, excessive increase in deposition temperature results in the increase of the concentration of vacancies and interfacial degradation. The simulation results assume the ideal material properties and does not consider the process-induced defects. As a result, the practical devices exhibits higher on-resistance and leakage current than predicted by ideal devices as in the case of the simulation. The simulation results consider the ideal conditions of the substrate or the fabricated device like the absence of trap states, interface state density, structural defects, full depletion of the drift region and so on [38]. Also, the simulation results do not consider any interface inhomogeneity caused by the metal contact formation or edge leakage currents that may possibly present in the fabricated device. Owing to these above facts, the reverse leakage current increases leading to a premature breakdown occurrence in the experimentally fabricated device as against the simulated results. Further, the field-driven migration of intrinsic vacancies are the long-term reliability concerns and degradation mechanisms in high-field metal-oxide devices that alters junction properties and results in failure mechanisms like increase in leakage current, dielectric breakdown and resistive switching. Cu2O is a p-type semiconductor where copper vacancies ($V_{Cu}$) are the dominant defects. Under high electric field stress, $V_{Cu}$ migrate towards the cathode causing a significant degradation. This migration leads an increase in trap-assisted leakage currents, and increased conductivity resulting in a premature breakdown of the p-Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 junction. In β-Ga2O3, oxygen vacancies ($V_O$) act as deep donors. Under high field, positively charged $V_O$ migrate causing accumulation at the cathode generating a high concentration of traps leading to defect-mediated leakage currents. NiO is generally more chemically and thermally stable than Cu2O, reducing the propensity for phase degradation at the interface that is better suited for forming stable, high voltage devices.

Fig. 2. Simulated J–V characteristics of p-type Cu2O/n-type β-Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode in response to variations in (a) bandgap and (b) electron affinity of Cu2O.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/fig2.png

Fig. 3(a) and (b) presents the simulated forward and reverse current density-voltage (J–V) characteristics for the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction p-n diode with Cu2O thickness of 200 nm having doping concentration of $1 \times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$. The forward bias current in the linear region varied over 10 orders. The turn-on voltage and specific on-resistance of 1.7 V and 8.33 mΩ·cm2 was obtained from the forward bias J–V characteristics. The simulated Cu2O/Ga2O3 heterojunction p-n diode exhibited a reverse breakdown voltage of 1500 V. A validation of the simulation results was made using the experimental results from previous research studies. To align with the experimental results, the bandgap and electron affinity values of Cu2O were adjusted to 2.0 eV and 3.6 eV, respectively. The simulation results obtained closely matched with those reported by Wang et al. [39]. Wang et al. [39] reported a turn-on voltage of 1.7 V, specific on-resistance of 8.2 mΩ·cm2, and breakdown voltage of 1490 V for the CuOx/Ga2O3 heterojunction diode. This clearly demonstrates that electrical characteristics are almost similar to the reported experimental data validating the simulation of the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode. The edge termination techniques such as field plates, guard rings, and junction termination extensions can significantly enhance the breakdown voltage of Cu2O/Ga2O3 heterojunctions beyond the 1.5 kV that was achieved by optimizing only the junction parameters for an un-terminated device. The employment of edge termination reduces the peak electric fields at the device periphery managing the electric field crowding at the anode edge can push these devices to higher kilovolt-class performance levels. The Cu2O/Ga2O3 devices with edge termination can result in comparable, if not identical, high-voltage, low-leakage performance as compared with NiO/Ga2O3 devices. The reverse voltage at which the leakage current of 1 A/cm2 occurs is defined as the breakdown voltage. The breakdown voltage obtained for the power devices using TCAD simulation methodologies is usually determined by the impact ionization onset, usually identified as the voltage where the multiplication factor approaches unity or the leakage current shows an abrupt and exponential increase indicating the onset of avalanche multiplication. Breakdown voltage ($V_{BR}$) predictions are highly sensitive to the impact ionization model, specifically the ionization coefficients, the critical electric field and to literature-based material parameters of both Cu2O and Ga2O3. Since the impact ionization relies on high-energy carriers initiating further ionization, small changes in the material parameters like doping density, trap-limited conduction, or bandgap can lead to significant variations in the calculated $V_{BR}$. The simulation results must be validated against devices with known, measured doping concentrations and defect densities to confirm the modelled ionization behavior reflecting the realistic, rather than ideal properties. As considering the temperature dependence of the $V_{BR}$, the $V_{BR}$ of high-power devices usually decreases with increasing temperature, however the rate of decrease in $V_{BR}$ varies depending on device structure and termination. This decrease in $V_{BR}$ is associated with the increase in leakage current and impact ionization. A detailed study of the temperature-dependence of the $V_{BR}$ of the Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode will be carried out through simulation and for the fabricated diodes as our future work the results which will be published elsewhere. The temperature reliability of the devices can be improved through careful device design such as implementing advanced trench structures.

Fig. 3. (a) Forward J–V and (b) reverse J–V characteristics of p-type Cu2O/n-type β-Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode obtained through simulation.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/fig3.png

The operational J–V characteristics of the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode with the structure depicted in the inset in Fig. 4(a) were investigated as a variation of doping concentration of the p-type Cu2O, with the results illustrated in Fig. 4. The doping concentration of Cu2O was varied from $1\times 10^{15}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ to $1\times 10^{19}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ to study its effect on the electrical characteristics. As the doping concentration increased, the breakdown voltage rose from 390 V to 1500 V, with recorded values of 390 V, 400 V, 460 V, 1500 V, and 1500 V. However, the breakdown voltage remained unchanged for doping concentrations exceeding $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$. The increase in breakdown voltage with higher doping concentrations of p-type Cu2O is attributed to the widening of the depletion width in the drift layer, specifically the Ga2O3 epitaxial layer, as illustrated in Fig. 5. This is because the n-region (β-Ga2O3) is lightly doped leading to low donor impurity causing a wider depletion region in β-Ga2O3. As the depletion width of the drift layer widens, the electric field can be distributed over a larger area [40- 42]. The depletion layer is a high-resistance region formed by the space charge created on recombination of holes from the p-type semiconductor with electrons from the n-type semiconductor at the junction with the space charge density in the depletion layer being same for both the p-type and n-type semiconductors. On assuming that the doping concentration of the p-type semiconductor is significantly higher than that of the n-type semiconductor, the depletion width of the p-type semiconductor can be neglected. In this case, the depletion width of the n-type semiconductor can be considered equal to the total depletion width. In fact, it can be noted from Fig. 5 that the depletion width of the drift layer converges to approximately 9 μm at the obtained breakdown voltage with p-type Cu2O doping concentrations of $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ and $1\times 10^{19}\text{ cm}^{-3}$. The unchange in the breakdown voltage with increase in doping concentration of the p-type Cu2O above $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ is associated with the fact that the depletion width of the drift layer determined by the doping concentration has reached its limit at $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ thus limiting the voltage that the drift layer can withstand [43]. When the doping concentration of Cu2O is low, the resistance of the Cu2O thin film is high, resulting in the formation of a depletion layer that conforms to the shape of the anode electrode. However, as the doping concentration of Cu2O increases, the resistance of the Cu2O thin film decreases, causing the depletion layer, initially formed only beneath the anode electrode, to spread laterally across the Cu2O thin film. Consequently, the electric field, initially concentrated beneath the electrode, becomes distributed as the depletion layer expands laterally. As shown in Fig. 6, the electric field, initially concentrated at the edges of the metal, becomes well dispersed with the increase in doping concentration from $1\times 10^{17}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ to $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$, resulting in a significant increase in breakdown voltage [40].

Fig. 4. (a) Forward J–V and (b) reverse J–V characteristics of p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode with varying Cu2O doping concentrations obtained through simulation.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/fig4.png

Fig. 5. Simulated depletion width in the p-type Cu2O/n-type β-Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode at breakdown voltage with varying Cu2O doping concentrations.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/fig5.png

Fig. 6. Simulated electric field distribution in the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode at breakdown voltage with varying Cu2O doping concentrations.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/fig6.png

Figs. 7(a) and (b) shows the forward and reverse bias current-voltage characteristics of the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode structure as a variation of the thickness of the Cu2O film from 50 nm to 500 nm at a Cu2O doping concentration of $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$. From Fig. 7(b) it can be noted that the breakdown voltage rose from 610 V to 1500 V, with recorded values being 610 V, 940 V, 1310 V, 1500 V, and 1500 V with increase in the thickness of the Cu2O film from 50 nm to 500 nm. However, no change in breakdown voltage was observed for thicknesses greater than 200 nm. The increase in breakdown voltage with the increasing thickness of the p-type Cu2O film is attributed to the change in the depletion width of the drift layer, similar to the effects of doping concentration in p-type Cu2O [40, 42]. The increase in $V_{br}$ with increasing thickness is due to the fact that the thicker drift layer can accommodate a wider depletion region that allows the electric field distribution to occur over a wider area enough to accommodate the entire depletion region [44- 47]. At a doping concentration of $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$, the depletion width of the Cu2O thin film at the maximum attained breakdown voltage is calculated to be approximately 180 nm. The lower breakdown voltages in the case of the diode with thickness of the Cu2O layer less than 150 nm could be associated with the fact that the thickness of the drift layer is narrower than the depletion layer width and that the depletion layer spreads to the metal contact [48]. As the depletion width cannot exceed the thickness of the Cu2O thin film, for thicknesses below 180 nm, the maximum depletion width in the Cu2O thin film is determined by its thickness. Therefore, as shown in Fig. 8, the depletion width of the drift layer increases linearly with the thickness of the Cu2O film up to 200 nm, but no further changes occur beyond that thickness. A simulation was also carried out to determine the dispersal of the electric field in the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode structure as a variation of the thickness of the p-type Cu2O layer in the range of 50 nm–500 nm, with the results shown in Fig. 9. As illustrated in Fig. 9, the electric field is concentrated initially at the edges of the anode metal for lower Cu2O layer thickness. As the thickness of the Cu2O layer increases towards 200 nm, the electric field gets well distributed laterally in the Cu2O layer [40]. The increase in breakdown voltage with increasing thickness could be due to the increase in the depletion width leading to a lower electric field as the applied voltage will get distributed over a larger distance [47, 49, 50]. This imply that the PN diode structures fabricated with larger thickness has the ability in handling high electric field at high reverse bias.

Fig. 7. Simulated (a) forward J–V and (b) reverse J–V characteristics of the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode with varying thicknesses of the Cu2O film.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/fig7.png

Fig. 8. Simulated depletion width in the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode with varying thicknesses of the Cu2O film at breakdown voltage.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/fig8.png

Fig. 9. Simulated electric field distribution in the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode with varying thicknesses of the Cu2O film at breakdown voltage.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/fig9.png

IV. CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the electrical characteristics of the p-type Cu2O/n-type β-Ga2O3 heterojunction structure were systematically analyzed through simulations with a focus on the variation of depletion width as a function of doping concentration and thickness of the p-type Cu2O thin film. The turn-on voltage of the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction p-n diode increased from 0.7 to 2.7 V with an increase in the bandgap of Cu2O from 1 to 3 eV since it is difficult for electrons to move from the valence band to the conduction band with increasing large bandgap. The on-resistance of the heterojunction p-n diode decreased from 41.2 MΩ·cm2 to 0.815 mΩ·cm2 with increasing electron affinity of the p-type Cu2O layer due to increased current flow associated with a lower potential barrier at the junction. The breakdown voltage increased with increasing doping concentrations of p-type Cu2O attributed to the widening of the depletion width in the drift layer. The breakdown voltage increased with increasing thickness of the Cu2O layer due to the fact that the thicker layer could accommodate a wider depletion region allowing the electric field distribution occurrence over a wide area enough to accommodate the entire depletion region. From the simulation results, the optimized doping concentration and thickness values for the Cu2O layer in the p-type Cu2O/n-type β-Ga2O3 was determined to be $1 \times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ and 200 nm, respectively that resulted in a breakdown voltage of 1500 V with an on-voltage and on-resistance of 1.7 V and 8.33 mΩ·cm2, respectively. This study demonstrates the potential for optimizing the performance of Ga2O3-based p-n heterojunction diode employing p-type Cu2O thin films and paves the way for the design and performance enhancement of next-generation high-voltage devices.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This reseach was supported by This paper was supported by research funds of Jeonbuk National University in 2021, and by Korea Basic Science Institute (National research Facilities and Equipment Center) grant (No. RS-2024-00436672) funded by the Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea.

REFERENCES

1 
Y. Li, J. L. F. Zhang, C. Tian, X. Wang, S. Wei, G. Zhang, and W. Yang, “First demonstration of CuCrO2/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode with high breakdown voltage and low leakage current”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 72, pp. 4005-4010, 2025.DOI
2 
J. S. Li, C. C. Chiang, H. H. Wan, T. J. Yoo, F. Ren, H. Kim, and S. J. Pearton, “Breakdown up to 13.5 kV in NiO/β-Ga2O3 vertical heterojunction rectifiers”, ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, vol. 13, 2024.DOI
3 
S. J. Pearton, J. C. Yang, P. H. Cary, F. Ren, J. Kim, M. J. Tadjer, and M. A. Mastro, “A review of Ga2O3 materials, processing, and devices”, Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 5, 2018.DOI
4 
J. Y. Zhang, J. L. Shi, D. C. Qi, L. Chen, and K. H. L. Zhang, “Recent progress on the electronic structure, defect, and doping properties of Ga2O3”, APL Materials, vol. 8, 2020.DOI
5 
W. Li, K. Nomoto, Z. Hu, D. Jena, and H. G. Xing, “Field-plated Ga2O3 trench Schottky barrier diodes with a BV2/Ron,sp of up to 0.95 GW/cm2”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 41, pp. 107-110, 2020.DOI
6 
Z. Hu, H. Zhou, Q. Feng, J. Zhang, C. Zhang, K. Dang, Y. Cai, Z. Feng, Y. Gao, X. Kang, and Y. Hao, “Field-plated lateral β-Ga2O3 Schottky barrier diode with high reverse blocking voltage of more than 3 kV and high DC power figure-of-merit of 500 MW/cm2”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 39, pp. 1564-1567, 2018.DOI
7 
H. Zhou, Q. Yan, J. Zhang, Y. Lv, Z. Liu, Y. Zhang, K. Dang, P. Dong, Z. Feng, Q. Feng, J. Ning, C. Zhang, P. Ma, and Y. Hao, “High-performance vertical β-Ga2O3 Schottky barrier diode with implanted edge termination”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 40, pp. 1788-1791, 2019.DOI
8 
Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, Z. Feng, Z. Hu, J. Chen, K. Dang, Q. Yan, P. Dong, H. Zhou, and Y. Hao, “Impact of implanted edge termination on vertical β-Ga2O3 Schottky barrier diodes under OFF-state stressing”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 67, pp. 3948-3953, 2020.DOI
9 
W. Li, Z. Hu, K. Nomoto, and Z. Zhang, “1230 V β-Ga2O3 trench Schottky barrier diodes with an ultra-low leakage current of <1 μA/cm2”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 113, 2018.DOI
10 
B. Li, Y. Wang, Z. Luo, W. Xu, H. Gong, T. You, X. Ou, J. Ye, Y. Hao, and G. Han, “Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) heterogeneous and heterojunction power devices”, Fundamental Research, vol. 5, pp. 804-817, 2025.DOI
11 
X. L. Liu, J. Huang, Q. M. Wei, and L. Ye, “Potential design strategy of wide-bandgap semiconductor p-type β-Ga2O3”, Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 39, 2024.DOI
12 
J. L. Lyons, “A survey of acceptor dopants for β-Ga2O3”, Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 33, 2018.DOI
13 
S. J. Pearton, F. Ren, A. Y. Polyakov, A. Haque, M. Labed, and Y. S. Rim, “Status of Ga2O3 for power device and UV photodetector applications”, Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 12, 2025.DOI
14 
W. Hao, Q. He, X. Zhou, X. Zhao, G. Xu, and S. Long, “2.6-kV NiO/Ga2O3 heterojunction diode with superior high-temperature voltage blocking capability”, Proc. of 2022 IEEE 34th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD). Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 105-108, 2022.DOI
15 
Q. Yan, H. Gong, J. Zhang, J. Ye, H. Zhou, Z. Liu, S. Xu, C. Wang, Z. Hu, Q. Feng, J. Ning, C. Zhang, P. Ma, R. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “β-Ga2O3 hetero-junction barrier Schottky diode with reverse leakage current modulation and BV2/Ron,sp value of 0.93 GW/cm2”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 118, 2021.DOI
16 
C. Wang, H. Zhou, J. Zhang, W. Mu, J. Wei, Z. Jia, X. Zheng, X. Luo, X. Tao, and Y. Hao, “Hysteresis-free and μs-switching of D/E-modes Ga2O3 hetero-junction FETs with the BV2/Ron,sp of 0.74/0.28 GW/cm2”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 120, 2022.DOI
17 
X. Zhou, Q. Liu, W. Hao, G. Xu, and S. Long, “Normally-off β-Ga2O3 power heterojunction field effect-transistor realized by p-NiO and recessed gate”, Proc. of 2022 IEEE 34th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD). Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 101-104, 2022.DOI
18 
X. Zhou, Q. Liu, W. Hao, G. Xu, and S. Long, “Normally-off β-Ga2O3 power heterojunction field-effect-transistor realized by p-NiO and recessed-gate”, Proc. of 2022 IEEE 34th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD). Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 101-104, 2022.DOI
19 
Y. Wang, H. Gong, X. Jia, J. Ye, Y. Liu, H. Hu, X. Ou, X. Ma, R. Zhang, Y. Hao, and G. Han, “Demonstration of β-Ga2O3 superjunction-equivalent MOSFETs”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 69, pp. 2203-2209, 2022.DOI
20 
S. Ghosh, M. Baral, J. Bhattacharjee, R. Kamparath, S. D. Singh, and T. Ganguli, “Evaluation of valence band offset and its non-commutativity at all oxide α-Cr2O3/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction from photoelectron spectroscopy”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 130, 2021.DOI
21 
S. Ghosh, M. Baral, R. Kamparath, R. J. Choudhary, D. M. Phase, S. D. Singh, and T. Ganguli, “Epitaxial growth and interface band alignment studies of all oxide α-Cr2O3/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 115, 2019.DOI
22 
P. Schlupp, D. Splith, H. von Wenckstern, and M. Grundmann, “Electrical properties of vertical p-NiO/n-Ga2O3 and p-ZnCo2O4/n-Ga2O3 pn-heterodiodes”, Physica Status Solidi A, vol. 216, 2019.DOI
23 
H. Gong, F. Zhou, W. Xu, X. Yu, Y. Xu, Y. Yang, F.-F. Ren, S. Gu, Y. Zheng, R. Zhang, and H. Lu, “1.37 kV/12 A NiO/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction diode with nanosecond reverse recovery and rugged surge-current capability”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 36, pp. 12213-12217, 2021.DOI
24 
Y. Xiao, X. Li, H. Gong, W. Liu, X. Wu, S. Ding, H. Lu, and J. Ye, “Demonstration of Ni/NiOx/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction diode with F plasma pre-treatment for reducing on-resistance and reverse leakage current”, Applied Surface Science, vol. 578, 2022.DOI
25 
W. Hao, Q. He, K. Zhou, G. Xu, W. Xiong, X. Zhou, G. Jian, C. Chen, X. Zhao, and S. Long, “Low defect density and small curve hysteresis in NiO/β-Ga2O3 pn diode with a high PFOM of 0.65 GW/cm2”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 118, 2021.DOI
26 
K. Tetzner, K. Egbo, M. Klupsch, R. S. Unger, A. Popp, T. S. Chou, S. B. Anooz, Z. Galazka, A. Trampert, O. Bierwagen, and J. Wurfl, “SnO/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction field-effect transistors and vertical p-n diodes”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 120, 2022.DOI
27 
M. Budde, D. Splith, P. Mazzolini, A. Tahraoui, J. Feldl, M. Ramsteiner, H. von Wenckstern, M. Grundmann, and O. Bierwagen, “SnO/β-Ga2O3 vertical pn heterojunction diodes”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 117, 2020.DOI
28 
T. Watahiki, Y. Yuda, A. Furukawa, M. Yamamuka, Y. Takiguchi, and S. Miyajima, “Heterojunction p-Cu2O/n-Ga2O3 diode with high breakdown voltage”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 111, 2017.DOI
29 
Y. Kokubun, S. Kubo, and S. Nakagomi, “All-oxide p-n heterojunction diodes comprising p-type NiO and n-type β-Ga2O3”, Applied Physics Express, vol. 9, 2016.DOI
30 
D. O. Scanlon, B. J. Morgan, G. W. Watson, and A. Walsh, “Acceptor levels in p-type Cu2O: Rationalizing theory and experiment”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, 2009.DOI
31 
A. Mittiga, F. Biccari, and C. Malerba, “Intrinsic defects and metastability effects in Cu2O”, Thin Solid Films, vol. 517, pp. 2469-2472, 2009.DOI
32 
X. Wang, M. Li, Y. Jiang, K. Y. Wen, C. Y. Tang, F. Z. Du, C.-Z. Chen, C. K. Deng, Y. Zhang, H. H. Lu, Y. F. Cui, Q. Wang, and H. Y. Yu, “2.86-kV vertical Cu2O/Ga2O3 heterojunction diodes with stepped double-layer structure”, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 1036, 2025.DOI
33 
Y. Jia, S. Sato, A. Traore, R. Morita, E. Broccoli, F. F. Florena, M. M. Islam, H. Okumura, and T. Sakurai, “Electrical properties of vertical Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 (001) p-n diodes”, AIP Advances, vol. 13, 2023.DOI
34 
A. Takatsuka, H. Miyamoto, K. Sasaki, and A. Kuramata, “Fabrication of ampere-class p-Cu2O/n-β-Ga2O3 trench heterojunction barrier Schottky diodes and double-pulse evaluation”, Proc. of 2023 35th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD). Hong Kong, pp. 342-345, 2023.DOI
35 
J. Jiang, S. Wu, P. Liu, and Y. Tian, “Microstructure evolution and electrical behaviors for high-performance Cu2O/Zr-doped β-Ga2O3 heterojunction diodes”, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 16, pp. 40170-40179, 2024.DOI
36 
J. Park, K.-S. Park, J.-I. Won, K.-H. Kim, S. Koo, S.-G. Kim, and J.-K. Mun, “Control of pn-junction turn-on voltage in 4H-SiC merged PiN Schottky diode”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 110, no. 14, 2017.DOI
37 
S. M. S. H. Rafin, R. Ahmed, M. A. Haque, M. K. Hossain, M. A. Haque, and O. A. Mohammed, “Power electronics revolutionized: A comprehensive analysis of emerging wide and ultrawide bandgap devices”, Micromachines, vol. 14, 2023.DOI
38 
H.-K. Lee, V. Janardhanam, J.-K. Mun, T.-H. Jang, K.-H. Shim, H. J. Yun, J. Won, and C.-J. Choi, “Enhancement of device performance in vertical Au/Ni/β-Ga2O3 Schottky barrier diodes using regularly aligned inner field plates”, Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 191, 2025.DOI
39 
X. Wang, M. Li, M. He, K. Wen, H. Lu, C.-Z. Chen, Y. Jiang, F. Du, Y. Zhang, C. Deng, Z. Xiong, H. Yu, Q. Wang, and H. Yu, “Optimization of CuOx/Ga2O3 heterojunction diodes for high-voltage power electronics”, Nanomaterials, vol. 15, 2025.DOI
40 
C. C. Chiang, J. S. Li, H. H. Wan, F. Ren, and S. J. Pearton, “The optimization of NiO doping, thickness, and extension in kV-class NiO/Ga2O3 vertical rectifiers”, Crystals, vol. 13, 2023.DOI
41 
H. Zhou, S. Zeng, J. Zhang, Z. Liu, Q. Feng, S. Xu, J. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Comprehensive study and optimization of implementing p-NiO in β-Ga2O3 based diodes via TCAD simulation”, Crystals, vol. 11, 2021.DOI
42 
W. C. Ho, Y. H. Liu, W. H. Wu, S. W. Huang Chen, J. Tzou, H. C. Kuo, and C. W. Sun, “The study of high breakdown voltage vertical GaN-on-GaN pin diode with modified mesa structure”, Crystals, vol. 10, 2020.DOI
43 
J. S. Li, H. H. Wan, C. C. Chiang, X. Xia, T. J. Yoo, H. Kim, F. Ren, and S. J. Pearton, “Reproducible NiO/Ga2O3 vertical rectifiers with breakdown voltage >8 kV”, Crystals, vol. 13, 2023.DOI
44 
A. Sandupatla, S. Arulkumaran, G. I. Ng, K. Ranjan, M. Deki, S. Nitta, Y. Honda, and H. Amano, “GaN drift-layer thickness effects in vertical Schottky barrier diodes on free-standing HVPE GaN substrates”, AIP Advances, vol. 9, 2019.DOI
45 
N. Serra, G. Giacomini, A. Piazza, C. Piemonte, A. Tarolli, and N. Zorzi, “Experimental and TCAD study of breakdown voltage temperature behavior in n+/p SiPMs”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 58, pp. 1233-1240, 2011.DOI
46 
B. Setera, and A. Christou, “Threading dislocations in GaN high-voltage switches”, Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 124, 2021.DOI
47 
H.-C. Kim, V. Janardhanam, S. Pokhrel, and C.-J. Choi, “Epilayer thickness effect on the electrical and breakdown characteristics of vertical β-Ga2O3 Schottky barrier diode”, Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 649, 2025.DOI
48 
M. K. Hudait, and S. B. Krupanidhi, “Breakdown characteristics of MOVPE grown Si-doped GaAs Schottky diodes”, Solid-State Electronics, vol. 43, pp. 2135-2139, 1999.DOI
49 
T. Munir, A. A. Aziz, and M. J. Abdullah, “Epilayer thickness and doping density variation effects on current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of n-GaN Schottky diode”, Proc. of 2006 IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 892-895, 2006.DOI
50 
H. Zhou, S. Zeng, J. Zhang, Z. Liu, Q. Feng, S. Xu, J. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Comprehensive study and optimization of implementing p-NiO in β-Ga2O3 based diodes via TCAD simulation”, Crystals, vol. 11, 2021.DOI
Hyeon Cheol Kim
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/au1.png

Hyeon Cheol Kim received his B.S. degree in physics from Kunsan National University in 2021. He is currently an integrated M.S.-Ph.D. degree in the School of Semiconductor Chemical Engineering at Jeonbuk National University. His research interests include β-Ga2O3 power devices and wide-bandgap semiconductor devices.

Sameer Pokhrel
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/au2.png

Sameer Pokhrel received his M.S. degree in science from Tribhuvan University in 2016. He is currently a Ph.D. degree from the School of Semiconductor Chemical Engineering at Jeonbuk National University. His research interests include the fabrication and characterization of ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor materials for power electronics.

V. Janardhanam
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/au3.png

V. Janardhanam received his M.Sc. degree in 2003 and a Ph.D. degree in 2009 from Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, India. His research interests include the development of novel metal contacts for post-Si CMOS devices, 2D/3D heterojunction electronic and optoelectronic devices, and wide/ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor devices for high-power applications. He also works on polymer-based electronic devices, metal–polymer composite films for organic–inorganic hybrid nanomaterials, and defect analysis in semiconductor materials using DLTS techniques.

Chel-Jong Choi
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/au4.png

Chel-Jong Choi received his B.S. degree in ceramic engineering from Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, in 1997, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in materials science and engineering from Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Republic of Korea, in 1999 and 2003, respectively. He is currently a Professor in the Department of Semiconductor Science and Technology at Jeonbuk National University and the Director of the Semiconductor Physics Research Center (SPRC). His research interests include semiconductor device fabrication processes, compound semiconductor materials, wide and ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor devices, and advanced materials for electronic and optoelectronic applications.

Kyu Hwan Shim
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.5.340/au5.png

Kyu Hwan Shim received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in materials science and engineering from Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, in 1984 and 1986, respectively, and a Ph.D. degree in materials science and engineering (electronic materials) from the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, USA, in 1997. He is currently a Professor in the Department of Semiconductor Science and Technology at Jeonbuk National University. His research interests include compound semiconductor materials and devices, SiGe-based electronic devices, GaN-based optoelectronic devices, semiconductor process technology, and advanced electronic materials for high-performance semiconductor applications.