Study and Optimization of the p-type Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 P-N Heterojunction Power Diode via TCAD Simulation
Hyeon Cheol Kim1
Sameer Pokhrel1
V. Janardhanam2
Chel-Jong Choi1,*
Kyu Hwan Shim1,3*
-
School of Semiconductor and Chemical Engineering, Semiconductor Physics Research Center
(SPRC), Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
-
Department of Physics, School of Engineering, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru
560068, India
-
R&D Division, Sigetronics, Inc., Jeonju 55314, Republic of Korea
Copyright © The Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers(IEIE)
Index terms
Ga2O3
, Cu2O, heterojunction, PN diodes, breakdown voltage
I. INTRODUCTION
Ultrawide bandgap (UWB) semiconductors exhibit great promise in maintaining higher
voltages and better conversion efficiency for modern industrial and electronic products
since they are able to sustain higher critical fields, allowing for higher blocking
voltages at lower resistances [1]. Beta-gallium oxide (β-Ga2O3) has attracted significant interest as a highly promising ultrawide bandgap material
with immense potential in the field of power semiconductors devices. Owing to its
large bandgap of 4.8 eV, high critical electric field of 8 MV/cm, and high Baliga’s
figure of merit of 3400, Ga2O3 became an excellent candidate for high-power applications, outperforming semiconductors
like Si, GaN, and SiC [2-
4]. Despite the materials inherent capability, the current performance of the Ga2O3 based Schottky diodes, in particular the demonstrative device’s parameter power figure-of-merit
(PFOM) remains significantly lower than the projected material’s limits. In β-Ga2O3 Schottky diodes, the high surface electric field at the Schottky contacts induce
excessive leakage currents resulting in premature breakdown of the device. Further,
the defects at the metal/β-Ga2O3 interface introduced during the fabrication processing steps may result in large
reverse leakage currents under large reverse electrical fields. A suppression of the
reverse leakage current and enhancement in the breakdown voltage can be attained employing
a variety of field management techniques like field plates, trench type structures
and injection termination structures [5-
9]. Additionally, the lack of an efficient p-type doping technique for Ga2O3 is severely limiting the development of advanced Ga2O3 bipolar power electronics and as well for potential optoelectronic device applications
using p-n junction structures [10-
13]. This obstacle can be overcome by an alternative approach of constructing p-n junctions
employing p-type oxide semiconductors and n-type Ga2O3. Li et al. [2] fabricated NiO/Ga2O3 vertical heterojunctions and achieved remarkable breakdown voltage of 13.5 kV signifying
the importance of p-type NiO in forming Ga2O3-based p-n junctions. for high power device applications. This approach allows the
formation of various heterojunction devices with enhanced electrical performance,
including p-n heterojunction diodes (HJD) [14], heterojunction barrier Schottky diodes (HJBS) [15] heterojunction field-effect transistors (JFET) [16-
18] and super junction metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (SJ-MOSFET)
[19]. NiO is a superior p-type partner for Ga2O3 in high-power applications owing to its wide bandgap and superior breakdown voltage.
While Cu2O offers significant advantages in cost, ease of fabrication, and specific optoelectronic
applications. Cu2O is particularly advantageous for applications requiring high-efficiency visible
light absorption and offers a more accessible, earth-abundant material set. To approach
a 13.5 kV breakdown voltage in a Cu2O/Ga2O3 structure as reported by Li et al. [2] for NiO/Ga2O3 based devices, the drift layer thickness must be increased to 17–18 μm and the doping
concentration need to be approximately $8.8\times 10^{15}\text{ cm}^{-3}$. Practical
limitations with Cu2O include its narrower bandgap which increases leakage current, and the critical need
for advanced edge termination to manage the massive electric fields at the device
boundaries. Nevertheless, NiO possesses a much wider bandgap, superior thermal and
chemical stability compared to Cu2O, with the defect generation and migration under high electric fields are relatively
suppressed in NiO making it advantageous for achieving a higher critical electric
field and thus a higher breakdown voltage. In contrast, Cu2O has a narrower bandgap and a higher sensitivity to defects limiting the attainabl
e breakdown voltage under identical processing conditions. Approaching the performance
level of NiO-based heterojunctions using Cu2O would need advanced device engineering techniques like careful design of electric-field
management schemes, multilayer band-step architectures and extension of the drift
region. Based on recent research, Cu2O/Ga2O3 heterojunction diodes, particularly in Junction Barrier Schottky or p-n heterojunction
structures, exhibit superior reverse recovery times and switching losses compared
to conventional Ga2O3 Schottky Barrier Diodes (SBDs) due to charge storage effects associated with interfacial
and bulk trap states often leading to higher performances. They leverage a high-barrier
p-type material to reduce leakage current while maintaining low on-state resistance.
While, the NiO/Ga2O3 structure benefits from relatively lower trap activity and a wider bandgap, which
leads to more favorable reverse recovery characteristics and reduced switching losses.
The Cu2O/Ga2O3 heterojunctions are more suitable for medium-voltage, cost-sensitive applications
rather than ultra-high-frequency applications. However, owing to the intrinsic material
property limitations of Cu2O, there remains practical constraints on achieving full parity with NiO/β-Ga2O3-based devices and needs intensive research. Till now, the Ga2O3-based p-n heterojunction devices formed employing p-type NiO demonstrated high breakdown
voltages and the formation of p-n heterojunction devices with p-type Cu2O could be highly promising resulting in higher breakdown voltages.
Recently, various p-type oxide materials such like Cr2O3
[20,
21], ZnCo2O4
[22], NiO [23-
25], SnO [26,
27] and Cu2O [28] have been successfully employed in the fabrication of the β-Ga2O3-based heterojunction diodes. So far, there have been several reports available on
the fabrication of Ga2O3-based p-n heterojunction diodes with improved electrical performance [20-
31]. Among the several p-type oxide materials, Cu2O with an energy bandgap of 2.1 eV is one of the most promising materials with an
intrinsic p-type conductivity owing to the creation of an acceptor level above the
valence band maximum associated with the negatively charged Cu vacancies [28,
29]. Watahiki et al. [28] fabricated p-Cu2O/n-β-Ga2O3 diode and reported a reverse breakdown voltage of 1.49 kV with a specific on-resistance
of 8.2 mΩ·cm2. Wang et al. [32] reported a notable breakdown voltage of 2.86 kV for Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction diode employing a stepped double-layer (SDL) structure of Cu2O. The diode exhibited a turn-on voltage of 1.2 V, a specific on-resistance of 8.1
mΩ·cm2, a power figure-of-merit exceeding 1.0 GW/cm2 and operates normally to temperatures up to 473 K implying its thermal stability.
Jia et al. [33] fabricated the vertical Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction p–n diodes with Cu2O films deposited employing magnetron sputtering at substrate temperature of 600 °C
demonstrated superior performance compared to devices fabricated with polycrystalline
Cu2O thin films and exhibited a breakdown voltage of 1015 V. Takatsuka et al. [34] demonstrated Ga2O3 trench heterojunction barrier Schottky diodes using a p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction structure with a maximum current of 3.5 A and breakdown voltage of
986 V. Jiang et al. [35] fabricated Cu2O/Zr-doped β-Ga2O3 heterojunction diode that exhibited a near-ideal electrical behavior with a low ideality
factor of 1.6 and that Zr doping markedly enhanced the crystallinity of Ga2O3 at low substrate temperatures with a transformation of the amorphous structure of
pristine Ga2O3 films into the crystallized β phase. Despite the availability of the reports on the
Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diodes, it is of high importance to thoroughly understand the
effect of the doping concentration and thickness of the p-type Cu2O layer on the electrical characteristics of the Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode, in particular towards enhancing the breakdown voltage and
the on-resistance that determines the performance of the high-power device. Following
the recent 2025 reports by pearton et al. [13] and, in particular, studies published near the timeframe of the Pearton et al. 2025
review on β-Ga2O3, the optimized Cu2O/Ga2O3 heterojunction diode showed a Power Figure-of-Merit ($\text{PFOM}=V^2/R_{on}$) around
0.49–1.2 GW/cm2 makes it competitive with other p-type oxides. Till now, the NiO/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode currently hold the highest PFOM reported record for the
material system often exceeding 5–9 GW/cm2. The optimized Cu2O/Ga2O3 HJDs with a careful device engineering could lead to a very favourable balance of
high voltage and low resistance, placing them as a top alternative in the p-type oxide/Ga2O3 based p-n heterojunction systems.
In this work, we investigated the performance of the Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode by varying the parameters such as bandgap, electron affinity,
doping concentration and thickness of the p-type Cu2O layer. We have performed an extensive and systematic investigation on the impact
of these parameters on the electrical and breakdown voltage characteristics and the
electric field distribution under the anode contact edge of the Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode employing commercial technology computer-aided design (TCAD)
software Silvaco Atlas. These simulations have been carried out towards achieving
an enhancement in breakdown voltage of the Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode and its optimization. It is shown that the breakdown voltage
increased with increase in doping concentration of the p-type Cu2O layer until $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ and remained constant for $1\times
10^{19}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ implying that the depletion width of the drift layer determined
by the doping concentration has reached its limit at $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$
thus limiting the voltage that the drift layer can withstand. Further, the breakdown
voltage of the Cu2O layer with doping concentration of $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ increased with
increase in the thickness until 200 nm after which the breakdown voltage is noted
to be unchanged. A detailed discussion on the effect of doping concentration and thickness
of the p-type Cu2O layer on the Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode performance has been provided.
II. SIMULATION DETAIL
Fig. 1 shows the schematic cross-section of the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction p-n diode used in the simulation. A highly doped n+ Ga2O3 substrate with a doping concentration of $1\times 10^{19}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ is used
to form an n− β-Ga2O3 epitaxial layer having a doping concentration of $2\times 10^{16}\text{ cm}^{-3}$,
upon which p-type Cu2O thin films with various doping concentrations and thicknesses are deposited. For
the convenience of the simulation, the thicknesses of the n+ Ga2O3 substrate and n− Ga2O3 epitaxial layer were set to 1 μm and 10 μm, respectively. The simulation was conducted
using a 2D device simulator and Atlas Technology computer aided design (TCAD) software.
To simulate the electrical characteristics of the device, the thermionic current model,
Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) recombination model, and band-to-band tunneling model were
employed. For simulating the breakdown voltage characteristics, the impact ionization
model was employed. The physical parameters of Ga2O3, including bandgap, electron affinity, relative dielectric constant, and carrier
mobility, are summarized in Table 1. In contrast, the physical parameters of Cu2O were obtained from calibrated values extracted from previously reported experimental
data.
Fig. 1. Schematic of p-type Cu2O/n-type β-Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode used for simulation.
Table 1. Material parameters used for simulation.
|
Material
|
Ga2O3
|
Cu2O
|
|
Band gap (eV)
|
4.8
|
2.0
|
|
Electron affinity (eV)
|
4.0
|
3.6
|
|
Relative dielectric constant
|
10
|
7
|
|
Electron mobility (cm2/Vs)
|
300
|
|
|
Hole mobility (cm2/Vs)
|
|
80
|
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Fig. 2 illustrates the simulated current density (J)–voltage (V) characteristics of the
p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction in response to variations in the bandgap and electron affinity of
Cu2O. As the bandgap of Cu2O increased from 1 eV to 3 eV, the turn-on voltage increased from 0.7 V to 2.7 V.
This is because an increase in the bandgap of the semiconductor increases the energy
barrier formed at the p-n junction leading to a requirement of high turn-on voltage
to enable conduction in the diode allowing significant current flow [36,
37]. Additionally, as well known, a conduction band offset is generated when different
semiconductors form a heterojunction given by the electron affinity difference between
the semiconductors. A larger conduction band offset ($\Delta E_C$) is formed at the
p-type Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 interface that act as a barrier to electron injection from n-Ga2O3 to p-Cu2O, reducing forward current and increasing turn-on voltage, reducing injection efficiency.
To attain high injection efficiency, $\Delta E_C$ need to be relatively low to allow
high forward currents, while still allowing the heterojunction to function. $\Delta
E_C$ can be minimized by utilizing a junction barrier structure with a periodic Cu2O pattern on β-Ga2O3 leading to a low turn-on voltage via the Schottky junctions while the p-type Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction blocks the reverse leakage current. $\Delta E_C$ can be reduced by
inserting a thin buffer layer between Cu2O and β-Ga2O3 and also, by tuning the oxygen concentration in the Cu2O during deposition thus tuning the p-type carrier concentration and reduce oxygen
vacancy-related defects, thereby improving the band alignment. The variation of electron
affinity for Cu2O between 3.0 eV and 4.0 eV in simulations accounts for the significant impact of
surface states, stoichiometry, and intrinsic defects on the material's energy levels.
Pure Cu2O usually exhibits an electron affinity near 3.2 eV with the experimental values shifting
as the material deviates toward CuO or Cu4O3 mixed phases. Higher oxygen flow during deposition can alter the conduction band
minimum effectively shifting electron affinity across the simulated range. Cu2O is intrinsically p-type due to copper vacancies ($V_{Cu}$), but oxygen vacancies
($V_O$) are also usual. $V_O$ acts as a shallow donor that can introduce localized
states near the CBM, leading to band gap narrowing. This defect-driven shifting of
the CBM directly justifies exploring a wider electron affinity range to capture realistic
electronic environments. Form Fig. 2(b), it can be noted that as the electron affinity of Cu2O was varied from 3.0 eV to 4.0 eV, the on-resistance of the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction p-n diode is decreased from 41.2 MΩ·cm2 to 0.815 mΩ·cm2. In general, the on-resistance of a p-n junction diode decreases with increasing
electron affinity of the p-type layer. This is associated with the fact that a higher
electron affinity of the p-type material results in a lower potential barrier at the
junction allowing increased current flow and lower resistance on forward biasing.
This indicates that by altering the bandgap and electron affinity, it is possible
to control the turn-on voltage and on-resistance. The crystallinity of Cu2O exhibits a direct impact on carrier mobility and interfacial defect density that
effects the forward on-voltage and leakage current characteristics. In usual, the
polycrystalline Cu2O exhibits lower mobility and higher leakage current due to grain-boundary scattering
and a higher density of defects. While the epitaxial or highly crystalline Cu2O alleviates these non-ideal effects. As the deposition temperature increases, the
crystallinity of Cu2O improves; however, excessive increase in deposition temperature results in the increase
of the concentration of vacancies and interfacial degradation. The simulation results
assume the ideal material properties and does not consider the process-induced defects.
As a result, the practical devices exhibits higher on-resistance and leakage current
than predicted by ideal devices as in the case of the simulation. The simulation results
consider the ideal conditions of the substrate or the fabricated device like the absence
of trap states, interface state density, structural defects, full depletion of the
drift region and so on [38]. Also, the simulation results do not consider any interface inhomogeneity caused
by the metal contact formation or edge leakage currents that may possibly present
in the fabricated device. Owing to these above facts, the reverse leakage current
increases leading to a premature breakdown occurrence in the experimentally fabricated
device as against the simulated results. Further, the field-driven migration of intrinsic
vacancies are the long-term reliability concerns and degradation mechanisms in high-field
metal-oxide devices that alters junction properties and results in failure mechanisms
like increase in leakage current, dielectric breakdown and resistive switching. Cu2O is a p-type semiconductor where copper vacancies ($V_{Cu}$) are the dominant defects.
Under high electric field stress, $V_{Cu}$ migrate towards the cathode causing a significant
degradation. This migration leads an increase in trap-assisted leakage currents, and
increased conductivity resulting in a premature breakdown of the p-Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 junction. In β-Ga2O3, oxygen vacancies ($V_O$) act as deep donors. Under high field, positively charged
$V_O$ migrate causing accumulation at the cathode generating a high concentration
of traps leading to defect-mediated leakage currents. NiO is generally more chemically
and thermally stable than Cu2O, reducing the propensity for phase degradation at the interface that is better suited
for forming stable, high voltage devices.
Fig. 2. Simulated J–V characteristics of p-type Cu2O/n-type β-Ga2O3 heterojunction
PN diode in response to variations in (a) bandgap and (b) electron affinity of Cu2O.
Fig. 3(a) and (b) presents the simulated forward and reverse current density-voltage (J–V) characteristics
for the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction p-n diode with Cu2O thickness of 200 nm having doping concentration of $1 \times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$.
The forward bias current in the linear region varied over 10 orders. The turn-on voltage
and specific on-resistance of 1.7 V and 8.33 mΩ·cm2 was obtained from the forward bias J–V characteristics. The simulated Cu2O/Ga2O3 heterojunction p-n diode exhibited a reverse breakdown voltage of 1500 V. A validation
of the simulation results was made using the experimental results from previous research
studies. To align with the experimental results, the bandgap and electron affinity
values of Cu2O were adjusted to 2.0 eV and 3.6 eV, respectively. The simulation results obtained
closely matched with those reported by Wang et al. [39]. Wang et al. [39] reported a turn-on voltage of 1.7 V, specific on-resistance of 8.2 mΩ·cm2, and breakdown voltage of 1490 V for the CuOx/Ga2O3 heterojunction diode. This clearly demonstrates that electrical characteristics are
almost similar to the reported experimental data validating the simulation of the
p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode. The edge termination techniques such as field plates, guard
rings, and junction termination extensions can significantly enhance the breakdown
voltage of Cu2O/Ga2O3 heterojunctions beyond the 1.5 kV that was achieved by optimizing only the junction
parameters for an un-terminated device. The employment of edge termination reduces
the peak electric fields at the device periphery managing the electric field crowding
at the anode edge can push these devices to higher kilovolt-class performance levels.
The Cu2O/Ga2O3 devices with edge termination can result in comparable, if not identical, high-voltage,
low-leakage performance as compared with NiO/Ga2O3 devices. The reverse voltage at which the leakage current of 1 A/cm2 occurs is defined as the breakdown voltage. The breakdown voltage obtained for the
power devices using TCAD simulation methodologies is usually determined by the impact
ionization onset, usually identified as the voltage where the multiplication factor
approaches unity or the leakage current shows an abrupt and exponential increase indicating
the onset of avalanche multiplication. Breakdown voltage ($V_{BR}$) predictions are
highly sensitive to the impact ionization model, specifically the ionization coefficients,
the critical electric field and to literature-based material parameters of both Cu2O and Ga2O3. Since the impact ionization relies on high-energy carriers initiating further ionization,
small changes in the material parameters like doping density, trap-limited conduction,
or bandgap can lead to significant variations in the calculated $V_{BR}$. The simulation
results must be validated against devices with known, measured doping concentrations
and defect densities to confirm the modelled ionization behavior reflecting the realistic,
rather than ideal properties. As considering the temperature dependence of the $V_{BR}$,
the $V_{BR}$ of high-power devices usually decreases with increasing temperature,
however the rate of decrease in $V_{BR}$ varies depending on device structure and
termination. This decrease in $V_{BR}$ is associated with the increase in leakage
current and impact ionization. A detailed study of the temperature-dependence of the
$V_{BR}$ of the Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode will be carried out through simulation and for the fabricated
diodes as our future work the results which will be published elsewhere. The temperature
reliability of the devices can be improved through careful device design such as implementing
advanced trench structures.
Fig. 3. (a) Forward J–V and (b) reverse J–V characteristics of p-type Cu2O/n-type
β-Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode obtained through simulation.
The operational J–V characteristics of the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode with the structure depicted in the inset in Fig. 4(a) were investigated as a variation of doping concentration of the p-type Cu2O, with the results illustrated in Fig. 4. The doping concentration of Cu2O was varied from $1\times 10^{15}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ to $1\times 10^{19}\text{ cm}^{-3}$
to study its effect on the electrical characteristics. As the doping concentration
increased, the breakdown voltage rose from 390 V to 1500 V, with recorded values of
390 V, 400 V, 460 V, 1500 V, and 1500 V. However, the breakdown voltage remained unchanged
for doping concentrations exceeding $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$. The increase
in breakdown voltage with higher doping concentrations of p-type Cu2O is attributed to the widening of the depletion width in the drift layer, specifically
the Ga2O3 epitaxial layer, as illustrated in Fig. 5. This is because the n-region (β-Ga2O3) is lightly doped leading to low donor impurity causing a wider depletion region
in β-Ga2O3. As the depletion width of the drift layer widens, the electric field can be distributed
over a larger area [40-
42]. The depletion layer is a high-resistance region formed by the space charge created
on recombination of holes from the p-type semiconductor with electrons from the n-type
semiconductor at the junction with the space charge density in the depletion layer
being same for both the p-type and n-type semiconductors. On assuming that the doping
concentration of the p-type semiconductor is significantly higher than that of the
n-type semiconductor, the depletion width of the p-type semiconductor can be neglected.
In this case, the depletion width of the n-type semiconductor can be considered equal
to the total depletion width. In fact, it can be noted from Fig. 5 that the depletion width of the drift layer converges to approximately 9 μm at the
obtained breakdown voltage with p-type Cu2O doping concentrations of $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ and $1\times 10^{19}\text{
cm}^{-3}$. The unchange in the breakdown voltage with increase in doping concentration
of the p-type Cu2O above $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ is associated with the fact that the depletion
width of the drift layer determined by the doping concentration has reached its limit
at $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ thus limiting the voltage that the drift layer
can withstand [43]. When the doping concentration of Cu2O is low, the resistance of the Cu2O thin film is high, resulting in the formation of a depletion layer that conforms
to the shape of the anode electrode. However, as the doping concentration of Cu2O increases, the resistance of the Cu2O thin film decreases, causing the depletion layer, initially formed only beneath
the anode electrode, to spread laterally across the Cu2O thin film. Consequently, the electric field, initially concentrated beneath the
electrode, becomes distributed as the depletion layer expands laterally. As shown
in Fig. 6, the electric field, initially concentrated at the edges of the metal, becomes well
dispersed with the increase in doping concentration from $1\times 10^{17}\text{ cm}^{-3}$
to $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$, resulting in a significant increase in breakdown
voltage [40].
Fig. 4. (a) Forward J–V and (b) reverse J–V characteristics of p-type Cu2O/n-type
Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode with varying Cu2O doping concentrations obtained through
simulation.
Fig. 5. Simulated depletion width in the p-type Cu2O/n-type β-Ga2O3 heterojunction
PN diode at breakdown voltage with varying Cu2O doping concentrations.
Fig. 6. Simulated electric field distribution in the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction
PN diode at breakdown voltage with varying Cu2O doping concentrations.
Figs. 7(a) and (b) shows the forward and reverse bias current-voltage characteristics of the p-type
Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode structure as a variation of the thickness of the Cu2O film from 50 nm to 500 nm at a Cu2O doping concentration of $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$. From Fig. 7(b) it can be noted that the breakdown voltage rose from 610 V to 1500 V, with recorded
values being 610 V, 940 V, 1310 V, 1500 V, and 1500 V with increase in the thickness
of the Cu2O film from 50 nm to 500 nm. However, no change in breakdown voltage was observed
for thicknesses greater than 200 nm. The increase in breakdown voltage with the increasing
thickness of the p-type Cu2O film is attributed to the change in the depletion width of the drift layer, similar
to the effects of doping concentration in p-type Cu2O [40,
42]. The increase in $V_{br}$ with increasing thickness is due to the fact that the thicker
drift layer can accommodate a wider depletion region that allows the electric field
distribution to occur over a wider area enough to accommodate the entire depletion
region [44-
47]. At a doping concentration of $1\times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$, the depletion width
of the Cu2O thin film at the maximum attained breakdown voltage is calculated to be approximately
180 nm. The lower breakdown voltages in the case of the diode with thickness of the
Cu2O layer less than 150 nm could be associated with the fact that the thickness of the
drift layer is narrower than the depletion layer width and that the depletion layer
spreads to the metal contact [48]. As the depletion width cannot exceed the thickness of the Cu2O thin film, for thicknesses below 180 nm, the maximum depletion width in the Cu2O thin film is determined by its thickness. Therefore, as shown in Fig. 8, the depletion width of the drift layer increases linearly with the thickness of
the Cu2O film up to 200 nm, but no further changes occur beyond that thickness. A simulation
was also carried out to determine the dispersal of the electric field in the p-type
Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode structure as a variation of the thickness of the p-type Cu2O layer in the range of 50 nm–500 nm, with the results shown in Fig. 9. As illustrated in Fig. 9, the electric field is concentrated initially at the edges of the anode metal for
lower Cu2O layer thickness. As the thickness of the Cu2O layer increases towards 200 nm, the electric field gets well distributed laterally
in the Cu2O layer [40]. The increase in breakdown voltage with increasing thickness could be due to the
increase in the depletion width leading to a lower electric field as the applied voltage
will get distributed over a larger distance [47,
49,
50]. This imply that the PN diode structures fabricated with larger thickness has the
ability in handling high electric field at high reverse bias.
Fig. 7. Simulated (a) forward J–V and (b) reverse J–V characteristics of the p-type
Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN diode with varying thicknesses of the Cu2O film.
Fig. 8. Simulated depletion width in the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction PN
diode with varying thicknesses of the Cu2O film at breakdown voltage.
Fig. 9. Simulated electric field distribution in the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction
PN diode with varying thicknesses of the Cu2O film at breakdown voltage.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
In this study, the electrical characteristics of the p-type Cu2O/n-type β-Ga2O3 heterojunction structure were systematically analyzed through simulations with a
focus on the variation of depletion width as a function of doping concentration and
thickness of the p-type Cu2O thin film. The turn-on voltage of the p-type Cu2O/n-type Ga2O3 heterojunction p-n diode increased from 0.7 to 2.7 V with an increase in the bandgap
of Cu2O from 1 to 3 eV since it is difficult for electrons to move from the valence band
to the conduction band with increasing large bandgap. The on-resistance of the heterojunction
p-n diode decreased from 41.2 MΩ·cm2 to 0.815 mΩ·cm2 with increasing electron affinity of the p-type Cu2O layer due to increased current flow associated with a lower potential barrier at
the junction. The breakdown voltage increased with increasing doping concentrations
of p-type Cu2O attributed to the widening of the depletion width in the drift layer. The breakdown
voltage increased with increasing thickness of the Cu2O layer due to the fact that the thicker layer could accommodate a wider depletion
region allowing the electric field distribution occurrence over a wide area enough
to accommodate the entire depletion region. From the simulation results, the optimized
doping concentration and thickness values for the Cu2O layer in the p-type Cu2O/n-type β-Ga2O3 was determined to be $1 \times 10^{18}\text{ cm}^{-3}$ and 200 nm, respectively that
resulted in a breakdown voltage of 1500 V with an on-voltage and on-resistance of
1.7 V and 8.33 mΩ·cm2, respectively. This study demonstrates the potential for optimizing the performance
of Ga2O3-based p-n heterojunction diode employing p-type Cu2O thin films and paves the way for the design and performance enhancement of next-generation
high-voltage devices.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This reseach was supported by This paper was supported by research funds of Jeonbuk
National University in 2021, and by Korea Basic Science Institute (National research
Facilities and Equipment Center) grant (No. RS-2024-00436672) funded by the Ministry
of Education, Republic of Korea.
REFERENCES
Y. Li, J. L. F. Zhang, C. Tian, X. Wang, S. Wei, G. Zhang, and W. Yang, “First demonstration
of CuCrO2/β-Ga2O3 p-n heterojunction diode with high breakdown voltage and low leakage
current”,
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 72, pp. 4005-4010, 2025.

J. S. Li, C. C. Chiang, H. H. Wan, T. J. Yoo, F. Ren, H. Kim, and S. J. Pearton,
“Breakdown up to 13.5 kV in NiO/β-Ga2O3 vertical heterojunction rectifiers”,
ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, vol. 13, 2024.

S. J. Pearton, J. C. Yang, P. H. Cary, F. Ren, J. Kim, M. J. Tadjer, and M. A. Mastro,
“A review of Ga2O3 materials, processing, and devices”,
Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 5, 2018.

J. Y. Zhang, J. L. Shi, D. C. Qi, L. Chen, and K. H. L. Zhang, “Recent progress on
the electronic structure, defect, and doping properties of Ga2O3”,
APL Materials, vol. 8, 2020.

W. Li, K. Nomoto, Z. Hu, D. Jena, and H. G. Xing, “Field-plated Ga2O3 trench Schottky
barrier diodes with a BV2/Ron,sp of up to 0.95 GW/cm2”,
IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 41, pp. 107-110, 2020.

Z. Hu, H. Zhou, Q. Feng, J. Zhang, C. Zhang, K. Dang, Y. Cai, Z. Feng, Y. Gao, X.
Kang, and Y. Hao, “Field-plated lateral β-Ga2O3 Schottky barrier diode with high
reverse blocking voltage of more than 3 kV and high DC power figure-of-merit of 500
MW/cm2”,
IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 39, pp. 1564-1567, 2018.

H. Zhou, Q. Yan, J. Zhang, Y. Lv, Z. Liu, Y. Zhang, K. Dang, P. Dong, Z. Feng, Q.
Feng, J. Ning, C. Zhang, P. Ma, and Y. Hao, “High-performance vertical β-Ga2O3 Schottky
barrier diode with implanted edge termination”,
IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 40, pp. 1788-1791, 2019.

Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, Z. Feng, Z. Hu, J. Chen, K. Dang, Q. Yan, P. Dong, H. Zhou, and
Y. Hao, “Impact of implanted edge termination on vertical β-Ga2O3 Schottky barrier
diodes under OFF-state stressing”,
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 67, pp. 3948-3953, 2020.

W. Li, Z. Hu, K. Nomoto, and Z. Zhang, “1230 V β-Ga2O3 trench Schottky barrier diodes
with an ultra-low leakage current of <1 μA/cm2”,
Applied Physics Letters, vol. 113, 2018.

B. Li, Y. Wang, Z. Luo, W. Xu, H. Gong, T. You, X. Ou, J. Ye, Y. Hao, and G. Han,
“Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) heterogeneous and heterojunction power devices”,
Fundamental Research, vol. 5, pp. 804-817, 2025.

X. L. Liu, J. Huang, Q. M. Wei, and L. Ye, “Potential design strategy of wide-bandgap
semiconductor p-type β-Ga2O3”,
Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 39, 2024.

J. L. Lyons, “A survey of acceptor dopants for β-Ga2O3”,
Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 33, 2018.

S. J. Pearton, F. Ren, A. Y. Polyakov, A. Haque, M. Labed, and Y. S. Rim, “Status
of Ga2O3 for power device and UV photodetector applications”,
Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 12, 2025.

W. Hao, Q. He, X. Zhou, X. Zhao, G. Xu, and S. Long, “2.6-kV NiO/Ga2O3 heterojunction
diode with superior high-temperature voltage blocking capability”,
Proc. of 2022 IEEE 34th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and
ICs (ISPSD). Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 105-108, 2022.

Q. Yan, H. Gong, J. Zhang, J. Ye, H. Zhou, Z. Liu, S. Xu, C. Wang, Z. Hu, Q. Feng,
J. Ning, C. Zhang, P. Ma, R. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “β-Ga2O3 hetero-junction barrier
Schottky diode with reverse leakage current modulation and BV2/Ron,sp value of 0.93
GW/cm2”,
Applied Physics Letters, vol. 118, 2021.

C. Wang, H. Zhou, J. Zhang, W. Mu, J. Wei, Z. Jia, X. Zheng, X. Luo, X. Tao, and
Y. Hao, “Hysteresis-free and μs-switching of D/E-modes Ga2O3 hetero-junction FETs
with the BV2/Ron,sp of 0.74/0.28 GW/cm2”,
Applied Physics Letters, vol. 120, 2022.

X. Zhou, Q. Liu, W. Hao, G. Xu, and S. Long, “Normally-off β-Ga2O3 power heterojunction
field effect-transistor realized by p-NiO and recessed gate”,
Proc. of 2022 IEEE 34th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and
ICs (ISPSD). Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 101-104, 2022.

X. Zhou, Q. Liu, W. Hao, G. Xu, and S. Long, “Normally-off β-Ga2O3 power heterojunction
field-effect-transistor realized by p-NiO and recessed-gate”,
Proc. of 2022 IEEE 34th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and
ICs (ISPSD). Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 101-104, 2022.

Y. Wang, H. Gong, X. Jia, J. Ye, Y. Liu, H. Hu, X. Ou, X. Ma, R. Zhang, Y. Hao, and
G. Han, “Demonstration of β-Ga2O3 superjunction-equivalent MOSFETs”,
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 69, pp. 2203-2209, 2022.

S. Ghosh, M. Baral, J. Bhattacharjee, R. Kamparath, S. D. Singh, and T. Ganguli,
“Evaluation of valence band offset and its non-commutativity at all oxide α-Cr2O3/β-Ga2O3
heterojunction from photoelectron spectroscopy”,
Applied Physics Letters, vol. 130, 2021.

S. Ghosh, M. Baral, R. Kamparath, R. J. Choudhary, D. M. Phase, S. D. Singh, and
T. Ganguli, “Epitaxial growth and interface band alignment studies of all oxide α-Cr2O3/β-Ga2O3
p-n heterojunction”,
Applied Physics Letters, vol. 115, 2019.

P. Schlupp, D. Splith, H. von Wenckstern, and M. Grundmann, “Electrical properties
of vertical p-NiO/n-Ga2O3 and p-ZnCo2O4/n-Ga2O3 pn-heterodiodes”,
Physica Status Solidi A, vol. 216, 2019.

H. Gong, F. Zhou, W. Xu, X. Yu, Y. Xu, Y. Yang, F.-F. Ren, S. Gu, Y. Zheng, R. Zhang,
and H. Lu, “1.37 kV/12 A NiO/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction diode with nanosecond reverse
recovery and rugged surge-current capability”,
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 36, pp. 12213-12217, 2021.

Y. Xiao, X. Li, H. Gong, W. Liu, X. Wu, S. Ding, H. Lu, and J. Ye, “Demonstration
of Ni/NiOx/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction diode with F plasma pre-treatment for reducing on-resistance
and reverse leakage current”,
Applied Surface Science, vol. 578, 2022.

W. Hao, Q. He, K. Zhou, G. Xu, W. Xiong, X. Zhou, G. Jian, C. Chen, X. Zhao, and
S. Long, “Low defect density and small curve hysteresis in NiO/β-Ga2O3 pn diode with
a high PFOM of 0.65 GW/cm2”,
Applied Physics Letters, vol. 118, 2021.

K. Tetzner, K. Egbo, M. Klupsch, R. S. Unger, A. Popp, T. S. Chou, S. B. Anooz, Z.
Galazka, A. Trampert, O. Bierwagen, and J. Wurfl, “SnO/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction field-effect
transistors and vertical p-n diodes”,
Applied Physics Letters, vol. 120, 2022.

M. Budde, D. Splith, P. Mazzolini, A. Tahraoui, J. Feldl, M. Ramsteiner, H. von Wenckstern,
M. Grundmann, and O. Bierwagen, “SnO/β-Ga2O3 vertical pn heterojunction diodes”,
Applied Physics Letters, vol. 117, 2020.

T. Watahiki, Y. Yuda, A. Furukawa, M. Yamamuka, Y. Takiguchi, and S. Miyajima, “Heterojunction
p-Cu2O/n-Ga2O3 diode with high breakdown voltage”,
Applied Physics Letters, vol. 111, 2017.

Y. Kokubun, S. Kubo, and S. Nakagomi, “All-oxide p-n heterojunction diodes comprising
p-type NiO and n-type β-Ga2O3”,
Applied Physics Express, vol. 9, 2016.

D. O. Scanlon, B. J. Morgan, G. W. Watson, and A. Walsh, “Acceptor levels in p-type
Cu2O: Rationalizing theory and experiment”,
Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, 2009.

A. Mittiga, F. Biccari, and C. Malerba, “Intrinsic defects and metastability effects
in Cu2O”,
Thin Solid Films, vol. 517, pp. 2469-2472, 2009.

X. Wang, M. Li, Y. Jiang, K. Y. Wen, C. Y. Tang, F. Z. Du, C.-Z. Chen, C. K. Deng,
Y. Zhang, H. H. Lu, Y. F. Cui, Q. Wang, and H. Y. Yu, “2.86-kV vertical Cu2O/Ga2O3
heterojunction diodes with stepped double-layer structure”,
Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 1036, 2025.

Y. Jia, S. Sato, A. Traore, R. Morita, E. Broccoli, F. F. Florena, M. M. Islam, H.
Okumura, and T. Sakurai, “Electrical properties of vertical Cu2O/β-Ga2O3 (001) p-n
diodes”,
AIP Advances, vol. 13, 2023.

A. Takatsuka, H. Miyamoto, K. Sasaki, and A. Kuramata, “Fabrication of ampere-class
p-Cu2O/n-β-Ga2O3 trench heterojunction barrier Schottky diodes and double-pulse evaluation”,
Proc. of 2023 35th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs
(ISPSD). Hong Kong, pp. 342-345, 2023.

J. Jiang, S. Wu, P. Liu, and Y. Tian, “Microstructure evolution and electrical behaviors
for high-performance Cu2O/Zr-doped β-Ga2O3 heterojunction diodes”,
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 16, pp. 40170-40179, 2024.

J. Park, K.-S. Park, J.-I. Won, K.-H. Kim, S. Koo, S.-G. Kim, and J.-K. Mun, “Control
of pn-junction turn-on voltage in 4H-SiC merged PiN Schottky diode”,
Applied Physics Letters, vol. 110, no. 14, 2017.

S. M. S. H. Rafin, R. Ahmed, M. A. Haque, M. K. Hossain, M. A. Haque, and O. A. Mohammed,
“Power electronics revolutionized: A comprehensive analysis of emerging wide and ultrawide
bandgap devices”,
Micromachines, vol. 14, 2023.

H.-K. Lee, V. Janardhanam, J.-K. Mun, T.-H. Jang, K.-H. Shim, H. J. Yun, J. Won,
and C.-J. Choi, “Enhancement of device performance in vertical Au/Ni/β-Ga2O3 Schottky
barrier diodes using regularly aligned inner field plates”,
Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 191, 2025.

X. Wang, M. Li, M. He, K. Wen, H. Lu, C.-Z. Chen, Y. Jiang, F. Du, Y. Zhang, C. Deng,
Z. Xiong, H. Yu, Q. Wang, and H. Yu, “Optimization of CuOx/Ga2O3 heterojunction diodes
for high-voltage power electronics”,
Nanomaterials, vol. 15, 2025.

C. C. Chiang, J. S. Li, H. H. Wan, F. Ren, and S. J. Pearton, “The optimization of
NiO doping, thickness, and extension in kV-class NiO/Ga2O3 vertical rectifiers”,
Crystals, vol. 13, 2023.

H. Zhou, S. Zeng, J. Zhang, Z. Liu, Q. Feng, S. Xu, J. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Comprehensive
study and optimization of implementing p-NiO in β-Ga2O3 based diodes via TCAD simulation”,
Crystals, vol. 11, 2021.

W. C. Ho, Y. H. Liu, W. H. Wu, S. W. Huang Chen, J. Tzou, H. C. Kuo, and C. W. Sun,
“The study of high breakdown voltage vertical GaN-on-GaN pin diode with modified mesa
structure”,
Crystals, vol. 10, 2020.

J. S. Li, H. H. Wan, C. C. Chiang, X. Xia, T. J. Yoo, H. Kim, F. Ren, and S. J. Pearton,
“Reproducible NiO/Ga2O3 vertical rectifiers with breakdown voltage >8 kV”,
Crystals, vol. 13, 2023.

A. Sandupatla, S. Arulkumaran, G. I. Ng, K. Ranjan, M. Deki, S. Nitta, Y. Honda,
and H. Amano, “GaN drift-layer thickness effects in vertical Schottky barrier diodes
on free-standing HVPE GaN substrates”,
AIP Advances, vol. 9, 2019.

N. Serra, G. Giacomini, A. Piazza, C. Piemonte, A. Tarolli, and N. Zorzi, “Experimental
and TCAD study of breakdown voltage temperature behavior in n+/p SiPMs”,
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 58, pp. 1233-1240, 2011.

B. Setera, and A. Christou, “Threading dislocations in GaN high-voltage switches”,
Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 124, 2021.

H.-C. Kim, V. Janardhanam, S. Pokhrel, and C.-J. Choi, “Epilayer thickness effect
on the electrical and breakdown characteristics of vertical β-Ga2O3 Schottky barrier
diode”,
Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 649, 2025.

M. K. Hudait, and S. B. Krupanidhi, “Breakdown characteristics of MOVPE grown Si-doped
GaAs Schottky diodes”,
Solid-State Electronics, vol. 43, pp. 2135-2139, 1999.

T. Munir, A. A. Aziz, and M. J. Abdullah, “Epilayer thickness and doping density
variation effects on current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of n-GaN Schottky diode”,
Proc. of 2006 IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 892-895, 2006.

H. Zhou, S. Zeng, J. Zhang, Z. Liu, Q. Feng, S. Xu, J. Zhang, and Y. Hao, “Comprehensive
study and optimization of implementing p-NiO in β-Ga2O3 based diodes via TCAD simulation”,
Crystals, vol. 11, 2021.

Hyeon Cheol Kim received his B.S. degree in physics from Kunsan National University
in 2021. He is currently an integrated M.S.-Ph.D. degree in the School of Semiconductor
Chemical Engineering at Jeonbuk National University. His research interests include
β-Ga2O3 power devices and wide-bandgap semiconductor devices.
Sameer Pokhrel received his M.S. degree in science from Tribhuvan University in 2016.
He is currently a Ph.D. degree from the School of Semiconductor Chemical Engineering
at Jeonbuk National University. His research interests include the fabrication and
characterization of ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor materials for power electronics.
V. Janardhanam received his M.Sc. degree in 2003 and a Ph.D. degree in 2009 from Sri
Venkateswara University, Tirupati, India. His research interests include the development
of novel metal contacts for post-Si CMOS devices, 2D/3D heterojunction electronic
and optoelectronic devices, and wide/ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor devices for
high-power applications. He also works on polymer-based electronic devices, metal–polymer
composite films for organic–inorganic hybrid nanomaterials, and defect analysis in
semiconductor materials using DLTS techniques.
Chel-Jong Choi received his B.S. degree in ceramic engineering from Hanyang University,
Seoul, Republic of Korea, in 1997, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in materials science
and engineering from Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju,
Republic of Korea, in 1999 and 2003, respectively. He is currently a Professor in
the Department of Semiconductor Science and Technology at Jeonbuk National University
and the Director of the Semiconductor Physics Research Center (SPRC). His research
interests include semiconductor device fabrication processes, compound semiconductor
materials, wide and ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor devices, and advanced materials
for electronic and optoelectronic applications.
Kyu Hwan Shim received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in materials science and engineering
from Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, in 1984 and 1986, respectively, and
a Ph.D. degree in materials science and engineering (electronic materials) from the
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, USA, in 1997. He is currently a Professor
in the Department of Semiconductor Science and Technology at Jeonbuk National University.
His research interests include compound semiconductor materials and devices, SiGe-based
electronic devices, GaN-based optoelectronic devices, semiconductor process technology,
and advanced electronic materials for high-performance semiconductor applications.