Mobile QR Code QR CODE

  1. (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, South Korea)
  2. (Inter-University Semiconductor Research Center, Seoul 08826, South Korea)



3D package, advanced packaging, finite element analysis (FEA), heat flux, high bandwidth memory (HBM), plugged sidewall, thermal management, thermal stress

I. INTRODUCTION

High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) has emerged as a critical component for high-performance computing (HPC) systems, enabling advancements in artificial intelligence, scientific simulations, and data-intensive applications [1]. Among the existing HBM technologies, the three-dimensional (3D) package structures offer a unique ability to meet the ever-growing demands for ultra-high memory bandwidth, low latency, high power efficiency, and compact form factors [2]. These characteristics are essential for enabling next-generation HPC systems to process massive datasets at unprecedented speeds while maintaining energy efficiency and spatial constraints.

Although 3D integration of the dies enables various advantages, it also introduces thermal challenges related to thermal management, mechanical stress, and long-term reliability [3]. 3D integration greatly shortens signal paths and increases density, but it also amplifies self-heating and creates tight thermal coupling between layers [4]. However, package level heat removal is bottlenecked because most heat from the logic die must flow upward through the dynamic random access memory (DRAM) stack or laterally through low thermal conductivity mold compound [5]. As the number of DRAM dies and the power of HBM increases, conventional heat dissipation methods struggle to keep junction temperatures and overall package temperatures below reliability limits. Therefore, new heat extraction paths that bypass the stacked DRAM dies are essential for the next generation, high stacked 3D HBM packages.

To address these issues, there were prior studies relying on using dummy-TSV (Through Silicon Via) [6], or dummy-bumps located inside the stacked dies [7]. Also, some research focused on adding extra dummy-die above the stacked dies, for heat dissipation purpose [8]. However, these approaches still create heat dissipation paths within HBM, which cause limitations on lowering overall package temperature, or fail to relieve HBM thermal load that worsens as the number of die stacks and the power of HBM increase. This paper proposes a method of using plugged sidewall surrounding DRAM stack of the HBM to reduce DRAM die temperature, overall HBM package temperature, and thermal stress inside the package by enabling heat extraction through additional paths bypassing the inner regions of the HBM.

II. PROPOSED CONCEPT

To alleviate thermal bottlenecks in 3D HBM package, we propose a novel design by incorporating an additional hollow rectangular structure, named a plugged sidewall, embedded in the mold compound region surrounding the stacked DRAM dies of the HBM. Copper was chosen as the material of the plugged sidewall due to its high thermal conductivity (~400 W/m·K) [9].

Fig. 1 depicts two structures of 3D HBM packages. The conventional HBM package in Fig. 1(a) places a cold plate on top of the package through a TIM, followed by a DRAM stack including TSVs and a bottom logic die. The logic die is connected to the substrate through C4-bumps with underfill. Meanwhile, our proposed structure in Fig. 1(b) keeps the same stacking and interconnect scheme but embeds a plugged sidewall, molded around the DRAM stack. This sidewall creates additional heat dissipation paths within the mold compound, reducing the logic die temperature. It also provides mechanical constraint, mitigating thermal stress concentration near the die corners.

Fig. 1. Cross-sectional (left images) and top side (right images) views of the (a) conventional 3D HBM package and (b) proposed 3D HBM package structure with plugged sidewall.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.2.97/fig1.png

As shown in Fig. 2(a), in the conventional 3D HBM package, most of the heat generated from the logic die cannot dissipate through the EMC region and is instead conducted through the DRAM stack, due to the low thermal conductivity of the EMC (~0.8 W/m·K) [5]. On the other hand, as illustrated in Fig. 2(b), newly added plugged sidewall structure creates a direct heat dissipation path that bypasses the stacked dies, thanks to the high thermal conductivity of the copper. This increases the effective paths for heat transfer, reducing heat flow inside the DRAM stack, and lowering the logic die temperature.

Fig. 2. Conceptual views of the heat flow in a (a) conventional 3D HBM package and (b) proposed 3D HBM package structure with plugged sidewall.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.2.97/fig2.png

The geometric dimensions of the plugged sidewall were determined through a sequential design process that prioritizes process reliability and thermal performance. First, the spacing between the sidewall and the DRAM stack was selected based on reported process stability guidelines and die-to-metal clearance criteria [10, 11]. Within this spacing constraint, the sidewall width was defined using the maximum available area on the underlying logic die to enhance heat dissipation, rather than through independent parametric optimization.

The proposed plugged sidewall was designed with reference to established and well-documented package-level fabrication processes, with the aim of maximizing process compatibility and practical feasibility. In particular, the design draws upon representative examples of mature techniques, such as post-mold laser structuring of epoxy mold compounds and subsequent copper metallization, which have been widely reported in advanced packaging studies [12- 17].

Regarding interfacial reliability between the copper plugged sidewall and EMC, it is well recognized that Cu–EMC interfaces in molded packages can be susceptible to delamination under thermo-mechanical stress and moisture exposure [18, 19], and therefore require appropriate consideration in design and process integration. In the proposed structure, however, the plugged sidewall does not introduce a new material interface but relies on the same Cu–EMC interfaces used in established packaging technologies such as TMV-based PoP and leadframe packages. Previous studies have shown that, with standard surface preparation, these interfaces can exhibit robust reliability under thermal cycling and humidity conditions [18, 20].

III. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS (FEA) SIMULATION RESULTS

1. 3D Modeling

For both the conventional and the proposed 3D HBM package structures shown in Fig. 1, the DRAM die stacks were modelled in 4-dies, 8-dies, 12-dies, and 16-dies HBM configurations. The terms 4-dies, 8-dies, 12-dies, and 16-dies each indicate that the number of DRAM dies in a stack is 4, 8, 12, and 16, respectively. Material properties used in the modeling and simulation were set based on previous studies [9, 21- 24]. All the material properties are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Summary of the materials properties used in the simulations.

Materials Young's modulus [GPa] Poisson's ratio CTE [10-6/K] Thermal conductivity [W/m·K]
Silicon 170 0.28 2.6 145
Nickel 200 0.31 13 90
Solder 90 0.42 18 58
Copper 70 0.34 17 400
NCF 2.3 0.33 76 0.5
Underfill 1 0.38 17 0.23
TIM 0.15 0.4 309.6 7.62
FR-4 22 0.35 17 In-plane: 0.81
Out of plane: 0.29
Epoxy molding compound (EMC) 30 0.3 18.5 0.8

To accurately capture vertical heat transfer within the DRAM stack, TSVs were explicitly modeled, as illustrated in Fig. 3(a). The TSV diameter and pitch were selected based on representative values reported in prior literature [25]. To maintain computational efficiency while preserving thermal fidelity, an equivalent TSV model was adopted in which the diameter and pitch were proportionally adjusted, while the total cross-sectional area and effective vertical thermal conductance were preserved. This modeling approach is consistent with simplification strategies reported in previous studies [26, 27]. The heat-flux distribution shown in Fig. 3(b) further indicates that the modeled TSVs serve as the primary vertical heat conduction path within the DRAM stack.

Fig. 3. (a) TSV modeling results within the DRAM stack (top DRAM die removed to show the TSVs), and (b) heat flux vectors indicating that the majority of heat in the DRAM stack is conducted upward through TSVs.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.2.97/fig3.png

Subsequently, 3D FEA simulations using ANSYS Mechanical software were performed to analyze thermal characteristics, including temperature distribution, the maximum temperature, overall heat flux paths and thermal stress distribution within the package. For the thermal stress analysis, we focused on the thermal stress at the logic die, especially the edge region of the logic die, where most of the thermal stress is concentrated [5].

2. Thermal Simulation

Fig. 4 shows the thermal simulation results for 3D HBM package structures. Thermal simulations were performed for 3D HBM packages with 4-dies, 8-dies, 12-dies, and 16-dies stacks under both the conventional and proposed structures. In all cases, thermal hotspots were found to be located at the edges of the logic die, consistent with prior thermal research on 3D HBM packages [28]. This primarily stems from the fact that the die periphery in the edge region concentrates more power into less area, increasing power density relative to the die center. Additionally, whereas the central region benefits from a direct conductive path through the HBM stack to the TIM and cold plate, heat at the edges must largely traverse the low thermal conductivity molding compound, which is a much poorer thermal pathway.

Fig. 4. Thermal simulation results for (a) the conventional 3D HBM package and (b) the proposed 3D HBM package with a plugged sidewall, showing the temperature distribution and the corresponding maximum package temperature.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.2.97/fig4.png

For the conventional 4-dies HBM structure in Fig. 2(a), the peak package temperature at the hotspot reached 108.1°C, as shown in Fig. 4(a). As the number of DRAM dies in the stack increased to 8, 12 and 16, the temperature rose to 110.6°C, 113.0°C and 115.4°C, respectively. However, when a plugged sidewall was added to the package, the maximum package temperature dropped to 92.6°C (~14.3% reduction) for the 4-dies case. Similar trends were observed for the other configurations, as summarized in Fig. 4 and Table 2.

Table 2. Summary of the thermal simulation results for 4-dies, 8-dies, 12-dies, and 16-dies 3D HBM packages.

Number of DRAM dies in HBM Conventional 3D HBM package Proposed 3D HBM package structure with plugged sidewall
Package max. temp. [°C] Package max. temp. [°C]
4 108.1 92.6 (14.3%↓)
8 110.6 94.9 (14.2%↓)
12 113.0 97.4 (13.8%↓)
16 115.4 99.8 (13.5%↓)

The results confirms that the improvement was consistent across all stack heights. This indicates that the plugged sidewall greatly strengthened the heat-removal path from the logic die to the top side, suppressing local hot spots while also effectively lowering the overall package temperature. Furthermore, these results show that, even as stack height increases, the proposed structure robustly enhances thermal management of the 3D HBM packages.

Moreover, Fig. 4 shows that the location of the maximum temperature differs between the conventional and proposed structures. This behavior originates from the asymmetric placement of the DRAM stack on the underlying logic die, as reported in prior studies [28, 29]. In the conventional structure, the maximum temperature appears on the side with the wider EMC region, where lateral heat dissipation is relatively limited due to the low thermal conductivity of the mold compound. In contrast, in the proposed structure, the wider EMC region incorporates a correspondingly wider copper plugged sidewall, providing an enhanced lateral heat conduction path. As a result, the maximum temperature shifts toward the opposite side with the narrower EMC region, where the plugged sidewall is thinner and offers comparatively lower heat dissipation.

To verify whether the heat actually flowed through the plugged sidewall as intended, we performed heat flux simulations and observed the resulting heat dissipation paths. The simulation results are revealed in Fig. 5. In the conventional HBM package structures (Fig. 5(a)), the available paths for heat from the logic die to dissipate were mainly through the DRAM stack or the mold compound. However, since the mold compound has significantly lower thermal conductivity than other components, the effective heat dissipation path was essentially constrained inside of the stacked DRAM, which enforces a limited thermal strategy. In the mold compound region highlighted by the black box in Fig. 5(a), little to no heat flux can be observed compared with the DRAM stack region. In contrast, Fig. 5(b) highlights that with the insertion of the plugged sidewall into the mold region, additional heat dissipation paths were created. As a result, the heat from the logic die could bypass the DRAM stack and dissipate through the plugged sidewall. The red-highlighted area in Fig. 5(b) shows that a substantial heat flux is now present in the mold compound region, where almost no heat flow had previously exhibited.

Fig. 5. Heat flux simulation results for the (a) conventional 3D HBM packages and (b) proposed 3D HBM package structures with plugged sidewall, illustrating heat dissipation within the package.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.2.97/fig5.png

3. Thermo-mechanical Simulation

Since the thermal hotspot temperature at the logic die edges decreased and the overall package temperature dropped, a reduction in thermal stress throughout the package is also expected as an additional benefit of these thermal improvements. Therefore, thermal stress analysis was conducted for both the conventional and proposed structures, and the results were compared.

Figs. 6 and 7 present the thermo-mechanical simulation results, showing the thermal stress distribution in the logic die and localized stress concentrations around TSVs, respectively. As widely reported for 3D stacked die structures, thermal stress is highest at the die edges [5, 30], and Fig. 6 likewise shows elevated stress at the corners of the logic die in the 3D HBM package. Localized thermal stress concentrations are also observed near TSVs, as shown in Fig. 7. Since such near-TSV stress concentrations are highly sensitive to local geometry and process variations [31, 32], the present study focuses on the comparative thermal stress behavior of the logic die. Accordingly, the average thermal stress at the four corners of the logic die was extracted and compared.

Fig. 6. Thermo-mechanical simulation results for the (a) conventional 3D HBM packages and (b) proposed 3D HBM package structures with plugged sidewall, depicting thermal stress distributions of the logic die.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.2.97/fig6.png

Fig. 7. Thermal stress distribution around TSVs in the conventional 3D HBM package, illustrating localized stress concentrations in the vicinity of the vias.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.2.97/fig7.png

The comparison results are presented in Fig. 6 and Table 3. Although the average stress rises with increasing stacked-die numbers for both structures, the proposed package structure yields lower average stress than the conventional structure for all stack heights. Furthermore, the proposed structure exhibits a more gradual rise with the increasing number of stacked dies. Thermal stress values at all four corners were also measured to have decreased in the proposed structure, compared to the conventional design.

Table 3. Summary of the thermo-mechanical simulation results for 4-dies, 8-dies, 12-dies, and 16-dies 3D HBM packages.

Number of DRAM dies in HBM Conventional 3D HBM package Proposed 3D HBM package structure with plugged sidewall
Average thermal stress at four corners of logic die [MPa] Average thermal stress at four corners of logic die [MPa]
4 545.5 366.7 (32.8%↓)
8 583.5 391.7 (32.9%↓)
12 675.6 432.2 (36.0%↓)
16 746.4 466.6 (37.5%↓)

When the exact average values are compared between the conventional and proposed designs, the reductions are 32.8%, 32.9%, 36.0%, and 37.5% for the 4-dies, 8-dies, 12-dies, and 16-dies structures, respectively, demonstrating consistent improvements across all configurations. Notably, the reduction exceeds 36% for the 12-dies and 16-dies cases, indicating that the benefit of the proposed structure becomes more pronounced as stack height increases. These results suggest that the proposed design more effectively mitigates corner-dominated thermal stress as stack height increases, making it especially attractive for high-stack HBM packages.

These reductions in the average thermal stress at the four corners of the logic die are potentially achieved by the thermal and mechanical factors. A decrease in the overall package temperature ultimately had a positive effect on lowering thermal stress, since the magnitude of thermal stress is largely governed by the temperature distribution and thermal load [33]. From a mechanical standpoint, the copper plugged sidewall acts as a mechanical constraint to the logic die, thereby providing structural reinforcement and mitigating thermal stress. Introducing mechanical constraint or local reinforcement at high-stress locations on the die, offers a practical benefit for mitigating thermal stress [34]. Moreover, since a high Young's modulus of the EMC material helps mitigate thermal stress in the die [35], embedding copper (with a Young's modulus over twice that of the EMC) into the EMC region will increase the region's effective Young's modulus and, as a result, has a positive impact on thermal stress profile of the logic die.

IV. CONCLUSION

In this study, we have demonstrated that embedding a plugged sidewall around the DRAM stack within the EMC region, provides an effective bypass for heat and additional mechanical constraint for the 3D HBM package with different DRAM stack heights. 3D FEA simulation results confirmed that the newly proposed package structure reduced maximum hotspot package temperature, and thermal stress formation on the logic die. Heat flux analysis showed that the added plugged sidewall effectively creates new heat dissipation paths that divert heat from the logic die away from the stacked DRAM, thereby reduces both the overall package temperature and in-stack thermal load.

Across 4-dies, 8-dies, 12-dies, and 16-dies configurations, simulation results showed consistent thermal benefits, with the package maximum temperature reduction about 14% for all cases. The proposed design also mitigated thermo-mechanical risks, lowering the average thermal stress at the four corners of the logic die by more than 32%, with 37.5% maximum reduction in 16-dies case. These results indicate that the plugged sidewall expands thermal headroom while alleviating corner-dominated thermal stress, making it a strong candidate for reliable higher-stack 3D HBM packages. Our study provides thermal management techniques for next-generation 3D HBM packages, and guidelines for thermal analysis methodology of vertically stacked die structures.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by Korea Planning & Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) funded By the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy(MOTIE, Korea)(RS-2025-02305881, PSU Development based on GaN·SiC Transfer Molded Module) and Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology(KIAT) grant funded by the Korea Government(MOTIE) (RS-2025-02214408, HRD Program for Industrial Innovation).

REFERENCES

1 
Kim K. , Park M. J. , 2024, Present and future, challenges of high bandwidth memory (HBM), Proc. of 2024 IEEE International Memory Workshop (IMW), pp. 1-4DOI
2 
Kabat A. K. , Pandey S. , Gopalakrishnan V. T. , 2022, Performance evaluation of high bandwidth memory for hpc workloads, Proc. of 2022 IEEE 35th International System-on-Chip Conference (SOCC), pp. 1-6DOI
3 
Kim H. , Hwang J. Y. , Kim S. E. , Joo Y. C. , Jang H. , 2023, Thermomechanical challenges of 2.5-d packaging: A review of warpage and interconnect reliability, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 1624-1641DOI
4 
Zhang S. , Li Z. , Zhou H. , Li R. , Wang S. , Paik K.-W. , He P. , 2022, Challenges and recent prospectives of 3d heterogeneous integration, E-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, Vol. 2, pp. 100052DOI
5 
Lee S. H. , Kim S. J. , Lee J. S. , Rhi S. H. , 2025, Thermal issues related to hybrid bonding of 3d-stacked high bandwidth memory: A comprehensive review, Electronics, Vol. 14, No. 13, pp. 2682DOI
6 
Dang K. N. , Ahmed A. B. , Rokhani F. Z. , Abdallah A. B. , Tran X. T. , 2020, A thermal distribution, lifetime reliability prediction and spare TSV insertion platform for stacking 3D-ICs, Proc. of 2020 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC), pp. 50-55DOI
7 
Feng W. , Kikuchi K. , 2024, Heat transfer study of 3d packaging structure with superconducting TSV for practical-scale quantum annealing machines, Japan Society of Applied Physics, Vol. 63, No. 5, pp. 51-55DOI
8 
Lin H. C. , Tseng C. W. , Chen Y. Y. , Tong H. M. , Liu C. W. , 2024, High-thermal-conductivity dummy die and finned lid for enhanced liquid cooling of 2.5D ICs, Proc. of 2024 IEEE 26th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC), pp. 144-147DOI
9 
Shweta J. , Ayush J. , 2024, Thermal conductivity of materials: Implications for heat management in medical devices, ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, pp. 131-138DOI
10 
Mok I. , 2020, Wafer level void-free molded underfill for high-density fan-out packages, Proc. of 2020 IEEE 22nd Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC), pp. 419-424DOI
11 
Ahmad S. S. , Reich M. , Haring F. , Berge L. , Mattson K. , Bauer-Reich C. , Gilbertson B. , Strommen G. , 2014, Package-on-package design and assembly process development for size reduction, Proc. of International Symposium on MicroelectronicsDOI
12 
Le V. N. , Chen Y. J. , Chang H. C. , Lin J. W. , 2017, Investigation on drilling blind via of epoxy compound wafer by 532 nm Nd:YVO4 laser, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 27, pp. 214-220DOI
13 
Antilano E. , Arellano I. H. , 2019, Ultra-short pulsed laser ablation of epoxy mold compound or copper frames for partial cut QFNs, International Research Journal of Advanced Engineering and Science, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 123-125Google Search
14 
He C. , DeWit R. , Chao J. , Champagne T. , Guino R. , Winster T. , 2022, Laser direct structuring of semiconductor liquid encapsulants for active mold packaging, Proc. of 2022 IEEE 72nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), pp. 1277-1281DOI
15 
Fee T. M. , Kah L. S. , Lock G. S. , Leong K. S. , Mukai K. , Magaya T. , 2014, Adhesion enhancement for electroless plating on mold compound for emi shielding with industrial test compliance, Proc. of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics (ICSE), pp. 313-316DOI
16 
Chonan Y. , Komiyama T. , Onuki J. , Nagano T. , Akahoshi H. , Itabashi T. , Saito T. , Khoo K. , 2006, Filling a narrow and high aspect-ratio trench with electro-cu plating, Materials Transactions, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 1417-1419DOI
17 
Saadaoui M. , Wien W. , Zeijl H. V. , Schellevis H. , Laros M. , Sarro P. M. , 2007, Local sealing of high aspect ratio vias for single step bottom-up copper electroplating of through wafer interconnects, Proc. of 2007 IEEE Sensors, pp. 974-977DOI
18 
Lakhera N. , Shantaram S. , Sakib A. R. , 2017, Adhesion characteristics of epoxy molding compound and copper leadframe interface: Impact of environmental reliability stresses, Proc. of IMAPS Symposium of MicroelectronicsDOI
19 
Kwatra A. , Samet D. , Rambhatla V. N. N. , Sitaraman S. K. , 2020, Effect of temperature and humidity conditioning on copper leadframe/mold compound interfacial delamination, Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 111, pp. 113647DOI
20 
Sukantharat A. , Ugsornrat K. , Sumithpibul C. , 2020, Effect of molding compound material and roughness leadframe to integrated circuit package for automotive devices, Proc. of 2020 Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology, pp. 173-176DOI
21 
Ishikawa Y. , Takao T. , Saito T. , 2023, Obtaining thermal resistance of mold compounds using a package structure model with a heat-generating test element group: Comparison of the thermal conductivity and glass transition temperature of epoxy mold compounds, Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 151, pp. 115233DOI
22 
Wang Z. , Ye G. , Li X. , Xue S. , Gong L. , 2021, Thermal-mechanical performance analysis and structure optimization of the TSV in 3-D IC, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 822-831DOI
23 
Rehmer B. , Bayram F. , Calderón L. A. Á. , Mohr G. , Skrotzki B. , 2023, Elastic modulus data for additively and conventionally manufactured variants of Ti-6Al-4V, IN718 and AISI 316 L, Scientific Data, Vol. 10, pp. 474DOI
24 
Nguyen T. T. , Yu D. , Park S. B. , 2011, Characterizing the mechanical properties of actual SAC105, SAC305, and SAC405 solder joints by digital image correlation, Journal of Electronic Materials, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 1409-1415DOI
25 
Agrawal A. , 2017, Thermal and electrical performance of direct bond interconnect technology for 2.5D and 3D integrated circuits, Proc. of 2017 IEEE 67th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), pp. 989-998DOI
26 
Zhou J.-Y. , Liang S.-B. , Wei C. , Le W.-K. , Ke C.-B. , Zhou M.-B. , 2019, Three-dimensional simulation of the thermo-mechanical interaction between the micro-bump joints and cu protrusion in cu-filled TSVs of the high bandwidth memory (HBM) structure, Proc. of 2019 IEEE 69th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), pp. 410-416DOI
27 
Kim T. , Lee J. , Kim J. , Lee E.-C. , Hwang H. , Kim Y. , 2022, Thermal modeling and analysis of high bandwidth memory in 2.5D Si-interposer systems, Proc. of IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems, pp. 1-5DOI
28 
Chatterjee K. , Li Y. , Chang H. , Damadam M. , Asrar P. , Kim J. , 2024, Thermal and mechanical simulations of 3d packages with custom high bandwidth memory (HBM), Proc. of 2024 IEEE 74th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), pp. 1054-1059DOI
29 
Chun K. C. , Kim Y. K. , Ryu Y. , Park J. , Oh C. S. , Byun Y. Y. , 2021, A 16-GB 640-GB/s HBM2E dram with a data-bus window extension technique and a synergetic on-die ECC scheme, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 199-211DOI
30 
Zhou S. , Ma K. , Wu Y. , Shizhao W. , Cai N. , 2024, A study on the reliability evaluation of a 3D packaging storage module under temperature cycling ultimate stress conditions, Micromachines, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 428DOI
31 
Radojcic R. , Nowak M. , Nakamoto M. , 2011, Techtuning: Stress management for 3D through-silicon-via stacking technologies, AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1378, No. 1, pp. 5-20DOI
32 
Athikulwongse K. , Chakraborty A. , Yang J. S. , Pan D. Z. , Lim S. K. , 2010, Stress-driven 3D-IC placement with TSV keep-out zone and regularity study, Proc. of 2010 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), pp. 669-674DOI
33 
Jiang T. , Ryu S.-K. , Zhao Q. , Im J. , Huang R. , Ho P. S. , 2013, Measurement and analysis of thermal stresses in 3D integrated structures containing through-silicon-vias, Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 53, pp. 53-62DOI
34 
Shen Y. , Zhang L. , Fan X. , 2015, Achieving warpage-free packaging: a capped-die flip chip package design, Proc. of 2015 IEEE 65th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), pp. 1546-1552DOI
35 
Wang X. , Cao S. , Lu G. , Yang D. , 2022, Viscoelastic simulation of stress and warpage for memory chip 3D-stacked package, Coatings, Vol. 12DOI
Eun Pyo Hong
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.2.97/au1.png

Eun Pyo Hong received his B.S. degree in electronic engineering from the Kyunghee University, South Korea in 2024. He is currently working toward a unified master's and doctor's degrees with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul national University, Seoul. His current research interests include advanced packaging and power module packaging.

Sang Won Yoon
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2026.26.2.97/au2.png

Sang Won Yoon received his B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea, in 2000, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering and computer science from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, in 2003 and 2009, respectively. From 2009 to 2013, he was a Senior Scientist and a Staff Researcher with the Toyota Research Institute of North America, Ann Arbor, where he conducted research in the fields of power electronics and sensor systems for automobiles. From 2013 to 2023, he was an Assistant Professor, an Associate Professor, and a Professor with the Department of Automotive Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul. Since 2023, he has been with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University. His current research interests include packaging and reliability of semiconductors, sensor systems, and their applications.