A Time-to-Digital Converter for Impulse Radio Pulse Width Modulator
Hyunki Park1
Jaemyung Lim1,*
-
Department of Electronic Engineering, Hanyang University, South Korea
Copyright © The Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers(IEIE)
Index terms
CMUT, PWM, TDC, PWM generator
I. INTRODUCTION
An impulse-radio pulse width modulation (IR-PWM) based wireless data acquisition system,
which encodes analog information in the form of pulse width and transmits it as impulses,
was proposed [1]. In the system, a high-resolution time-to-digital converter (TDC) with a high sampling
rate is necessary to accurately reconstruct the encoded signal. While conventional
systems have used high-speed oscilloscopes or ADC-FPGA platforms for pulse width measurement,
such approaches face limitations in memory to extend the system as real-time communication.
As shown in Fig. 1, this work focuses on the design of a dedicated TDC that directly digitizes the recovered
PWM signals. By replacing the external measurement instruments with an integrated
TDC, the proposed approach enables precise pulse width digitization and demonstrates
the TDC as an essential component for practical implementation.
Fig. 1. Conceptual illustration of the proposed TDC-based monitoring system for IR-PWM
pulse width measurement in CMUT-based ultrasound imaging.
Moreover, existing TDC designs reported in the literature are not suitable for IR-PWM
applications due to insufficient resolution, or limited adaptability to sub-nanosecond
pulse tracking.
In particular, the IR-PWM system requires a TDC with at least 10 MS/s conversion rate
and timing accuracy better than 24 ps [1]. However, previously reported designs fail to meet these specifications. For example,
the three-step cyclic Vernier TDC [2] achieves a resolution of 36–135 ps with a maximum conversion rate of 1.86 MS/s, which
is insufficient in both resolution and speed. The $256\times$ cyclic interpolator
TDC array [3] provides 20 ps resolution but is limited to 0.17 MS/s, falling short of the required
throughput by more than two orders of magnitude. Similarly, the high-linearity TDC
with a united-reference fractional counter for LiDAR applications [4] offers 19.5 ps resolution but only 999kS/s conversion rate, again far below the necessary
sampling rate. These comparisons demonstrate that existing TDCs cannot simultaneously
achieve the resolution and conversion rate demanded by IR-PWM-based systems.
However, achieving high linearity in the sub-gate delay region is challenging due
to process, voltage, and temperature (PVT) variations. To mitigate these issues, prior
state-of-the-art TDCs have relied on complex background calibration techniques, such
as Data-Weighted Averaging (DWA) [5], Digital Calibration [6], or Look-Up Tables (LUT) [7]. While effective, these methods incur significant area and power overheads and increase
design complexity. Conversely designs without linearization often suffer from poor
differential nonlinearity (DNL), leading to missing codes [8].
In this paper we propose a calibration-free, high-linearity Vernier TDC optimized
through a rigorous analytical methodology. To improve intrinsic linearity, a cascaded
buffer structure is employed for the unit delay cells which statistically reduces
the coefficient of variation (CV) of the delay by averaging random mismatches. Furthermore,
a device-level sizing strategy is adopted where transistor channel lengths are tuned
slightly larger than the minimum process size to balance high resolution with slew
rate (jitter minimization), while channel widths are optimized at the ‘delay saturation
point’ to maximize power efficiency and yield (targeting 5.2 sigma). Finally, to overcome
the resolution limits of external instrumentation, an on-chip PWM generator with fine
analog control is integrated, enabling precise characterization of the sub-picosecond
resolution TDC. This multi-faceted optimization enables the proposed TDC to achieve
an 8bit dynamic range with sub 3ps resolution and DNL<0.55 LSB without requiring any
auxiliary calibration circuits. The rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section
II describes the proposed architecture; Section III presents simulation and measurement
results; and Section IV concludes the paper.
II. PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE
1. Time-to-Digital-Converter
The proposed TDC employs the Vernier architecture with 255 delay stages, each consisting
of a slow buffer, a fast buffer, and an arbiter, as shown in Fig. 2. The number of stages was chosen to match the dynamic range of the IR-PWM transmitter,
which requires 8-bit resolution [1]. Unlike conventional TDCs that use D flip-flops, the proposed design adopts an arbiter-based
structure to minimize timing offsets and improve decision reliability [9]. In the Vernier scheme, the timing resolution is defined by the delay difference
between the slow and fast paths. The slow-path buffer delay is designed to remain
greater than that of the fast-path buffer even under the 5-$\sigma$ case, ensuring
monotonicity and achieving a resolution of 2.94 ps. The 5-$\sigma$ design margin was
selected to secure a 95% yield.
Fig. 2. (a) Block diagram of the TDC. (b) Unit stage of TDC. (c) Time diagram of TDC
operation.
Fig. 3. Simulated propagation delay versus transistor width, illustrating the delay
saturation effect.
To achieve high linearity without relying on complex calibration circuits, we optimized
the unit delay cell analytically. First, a cascaded buffer structure was adopted instead
of a single inverter. This reduces the coefficient of variation (CV) of the delay
by approximately 29.5% due to the averaging effect of random mismatches.
Second, the transistor sizing was optimized to balance resolution, jitter, and conversion
speed. The channel lengths were tuned to be slightly larger than the minimum process
feature size. This strategy ensures a precise delay offset for high resolution while
maintaining sharp transition edges (high slew rate) to minimize jitter. Unlike conventional
designs that utilize significantly longer channels for delay extension, our approach
prevents excessive degradation of the total conversion latency, thereby maintaining
a high system throughput.
Furthermore, the transistor widths were selected at the ‘delay saturation point’ where
the delay reduction diminishes due to the self-loading effect, as shown in Fig. 3. This optimization maximizes power efficiency while satisfying a 5.2 sigma yield
target to prevent missing codes.
As shown in Fig. 2 the rising and falling edges of the PWM signal are fed into dedicated edge detectors,
which then serve as the inputs to the arbiter. Within each stage, the signals propagate
through the fast and slow delay lines and gradually converge. When the lagging falling
edge catches up with the leading rising edge, the arbiter outputs logic high. All
subsequent stages then produce a thermal code composed of logic high values, from
which the input pulse width is derived.
Additionally, since the rising edge is applied to the slow path and the falling edge
to the fast path, a delay mismatch can occur at the arbiter inputs. To mitigate this,
fan-out adjustment was implemented at both input terminals to ensure delay matching.
The arbiter is also equipped with a reset function, enabling re-initialization after
each conversion cycle.
2. PWM generator for testing
To evaluate the resolution and accuracy of the TDC, a pulse train with a precisely
tuned pulse width is required. For this purpose, we designed an on-chip PWM generator
to produce the required test pulses, as shown in Fig. 4. The PWM generator incorporates a voltage-controlled ring oscillator operating in
the frequency range of 1.2 GHz to 2.5 GHz, corresponding to a supply voltage (VDDL)
range of 0.7 V to 1.2 V.
Fig. 4. (a) Block diagram of the proposed system. (b) Time diagram.
Instead of using the raw oscillator output, a frequency divider is utilized to generate
a signal with a guaranteed 50% duty cycle. Subsequently a logic controller selects
only the first pulse to generate a single-shot PWM waveform for the TDC input. Since
direct measurement of the picosecond-scale pulse width is challenging due to the bandwidth
limitations of I/O pads, the oscillator output is divided by a factor of 1024 to accurately
calculate the generated pulse width.
The integration of this on-chip PWM generator was a metrological necessity because
standard external equipment lacks the sub-picosecond resolution required to characterize
the proposed TDC (1 LSB, 3ps). The on-chip generator allows for continuous fine-tuning
of the pulse width via analog control voltage, enabling precise DNL/INL characterization
without the signal distortion caused by external cabling and pad parasitics.
III. SIMULATION AND MEASUREMENT RESULTS
The proposed TDC is implemented using a 28-nm CMOS process. The complete chip micrograph
is shown in Fig. 5, and the layout of a single TDC stage is depicted in Fig. 6. The TDC consists of 255 identical stages replicated horizontally. The actual area
of the TDC was measured to be 5792 $\mu\text{m}^2$, while the PWM generator logic
occupied 90.1 $\mu\text{m}^2$ as illustrated in Fig. 5.
Fig. 6. Layout of a single TDC stage.
Fig. 7. CV Comparison of TDC Delay Difference Using Buffer or Inverter.
Fig. 7 presents the results of Monte Carlo simulations comparing buffer resolution and inverter
resolution. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the buffer delay is 0.234, while
that of the inverter delay is 0.332, representing a 29.5% reduction for the buffer.
The CV is defined as follows:
where $\mu$ and $\sigma$ are mean and standard deviation.
The resolution of the TDC in the post layout simulation results, which is defined
as the delay difference between the slow and fast buffers, are shown in Fig. 7. The TDC achieved a resolution of 3.17 ps under the TT corner condition at a supply
voltage of 1.0 V. As the supply voltage increased, the delays in both the fast and
slow paths decreased, which resulted in a lower resolution. Across the supply range
of 0.9 V to 1.2 V and various corner conditions, the overall TDC resolution was found
to be in the range of 2 ps to 5 ps, as illustrated in the simulation results in Fig. 8. The measured TDC resolution was 2.94 ps, which is within the simulated resolution
range of 2.37 ps to 3.92 ps. The measured value reflects approximately an 8% deviation
from simulation due to PVT variations, yet remains within the valid range.
Fig. 8. Resolution under varying supply voltage.
To verify the linearity of the TDC, Differential Nonlinearity (DNL) and Integral Nonlinearity
(INL) were measured. The measured DNL and INL values were less than $\pm0.55\text{
LSB}$ and $\pm1.5\text{ LSB}$, respectively, as plotted in Fig. 9, which confirms that the TDC exhibits monotonicity and good linearity. The linearity
measurements were performed for codes 120–255 due to the maximum frequency limitation
(2.5 GHz) of the on-chip test VCO. However, since the TDC consists of 255 physically
identical delay stages replicated in the layout, the linearity performance verified
in the upper range is statistically guaranteed for the entire dynamic range.
Table 1. Comparison table.
|
|
TIM’22 [5]
|
JSSC’12 [6]
|
JSSC’08 [7]
|
CICC’17 [8]
|
VLSI’11 [10]
|
TVLSI’19 [11]
|
JSSC’24 [12]
|
TCASII’24 [13]
|
This work
|
|
Time resolution (ps)
|
8.5
|
1.25
|
1.25
|
1.25
|
0.63
|
2
|
7.9
|
3.1
|
2.94
|
|
Detectable range (bit)
|
11
|
8
|
9
|
11
|
11
|
16
|
18
|
10
|
8
|
|
Power supply (V)
|
1
|
1.2
|
1.2
|
1.1
|
1.3
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
1
|
1
|
|
Power (mW)
|
0.2
|
10.5
|
3.6
|
0.33
|
10.5
|
18
|
10.8
|
1.41
|
0.97
|
|
DNL [LSB]
|
0.3
|
0.7
|
0.8
|
1.08*
|
0.5
|
1.5
|
0.15
|
0.6
|
0.55
|
|
INL [LSB]
|
2.3
|
2.1
|
1.2
|
4.2
|
2
|
4.2
|
0.69
|
3.6
|
1.5
|
|
Technology (nm)
|
28
|
130
|
90
|
45
|
130
|
180
|
180
|
65
|
28
|
|
Area (mm2)
|
0.006
|
0.32
|
0.12
|
0.04
|
0.32
|
0.08
|
0.14
|
0.013
|
0.0058
|
Fig. 9. Measured (a) DNL and (b) INL.
The maximum conversion rate is determined by the summation of the maximum propagation
delay through the full delay line (4.5 ns) and the reset time (1.5 ns). This results
in a throughput of 166 MS/s, which provides a sufficient margin over the system requirement
of 10 MS/s. Continuous operation was functionally verified using a time-stretching
readout technique, as shown in the measured waveforms in Fig. 10.
Fig. 10. Measured waveforms verifying continuous operation using time-stretching readout.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
This paper presents a TDC designed to measure the pulse width of a pulse train. The
TDC was implemented in a 28-nm CMOS process and consists of a chain of 255 delay cells.
A PWM generator was designed and implemented to generate a test signal with sub nanosecond
pulse widths, utilizing a voltage-controlled ring oscillator. Measurement results
demonstrate a time resolution of 2.94 ps, with the DNL and INL measured within $\pm0.55\text{
LSB}$ and $\pm1.5\text{ LSB}$, respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The chip fabrication and EDA tool were supported by the IC Design Education Center
(IDEC), Korea.
REFERENCES
J. Lim, A. Rezvanitabar, R. L. Degertekin, and M. Ghovanloo, “An Impulse Radio PWM-Based
Wireless Data Acquisition Sensor Interface”,
IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 603-614, 2019.

V. N. Nguyen, X. T. Pham, and J.-W. Lee, “Three-Step Cyclic Vernier TDC Using a Pulse-Shrinking
Inverter-Assisted Residue Quantizer for Low-Complexity Resolution Enhancement”,
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 70, pp. 1-12, 2021.

P. Keranen, and J. Kostamovaara, “256 × TDC Array With Cyclic Interpolators Based
on Calibration-Free 2× Time Amplifier”,
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 524-533, 2019.

W. Zhang, R. Ma, X. Wang, H. Zheng, and Z. Zhu, “A High Linearity TDC With a United-Reference
Fractional Counter for LiDAR”,
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 564-572, 2022.

V. N. Nguyen, X. T. Pham, and J.-W. Lee, “An 8.5 ps Resolution, Cyclic Vernier TDC
Using a Stage-Gated Ring Oscillator and DWA-Based Dynamic Element Matching in 28 nm
CMOS”,
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 71, pp. 1-12, 2022.

Y. H. Seo, J.-S. Kim, H.-J. Park, and J.-Y. Sim, “A 1.25 ps Resolution 8b Cyclic
TDC in 0.13 µm CMOS”,
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 736-743, 2012.

M. Lee, and A. A. Abidi, “A 9 b, 1.25 ps Resolution Coarse–Fine Time-to-Digital Converter
in 90 nm CMOS that Amplifies a Time Residue”,
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 769-777, 2008.

H. Wang, F. F. Dai, and H. Wang, “A 330 µW 1.25ps 400fs-INL vernier time-to-digital
converter with 2D reconfigurable spiral arbiter array and 2nd-order ∆Σ linearization”,
2017 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC). Austin, TX, USA, pp. 1-4, 2017.

J. Yu, F. F. Dai, and R. C. Jaeger, “A 12-Bit Vernier Ring Time-to-Digital Converter
in 0.13 um CMOS Technology”,
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 830-842, 2010.

Y. H. Seo, J.-S. Kim, H.-J. Park, and J.-Y. Sim, “A 0.63ps resolution, 11b pipeline
TDC in 0.13µm CMOS”,
Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits. Kyoto, Japan, pp. 152-153, 2011.

R. Enomoto, T. Iizuka, T. Koga, T. Nakura, and K. Asada, “A 16-bit 2.0-ps Resolution
Two-Step TDC in 0.18-µm CMOS Utilizing Pulse-Shrinking Fine Stage With Built-In Coarse
Gain Calibration”,
IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 11-19, 2019.

X. Wang, Z. Zhou, C. Li, J. Hu, D. Li, and Y. Liu, “A Multi-Event, 7.9-ps Resolution
Time Amplification-Based TDC With an Ultra-Low Static Phase Error DLL Using Interpolator
Recycling Technique for dToF Applications”,
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 2946-2958, 2025.

X. Lu, J. Wu, Z. Wnag, Y. Xiang, L. Liu, and P.-I. Mak, “A 0.013 mm2 3.2-ns Input
Range 10-Bit Cyclic Time-to-Digital Converter Using Gated Ring Oscillator With Phase
Domain Reset in 65-nm CMOS”,
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 3635-3639, 2024.

Hyunki Park received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Hanyang University,
Seoul, South Korea in 2024, also he has now been working on an M.S. course at Hanyang
University. His research interests include time-to-digital-converter and wireless
communication systems.
Jaemyung Lim received the B.S. degree in electrical and computer engineering from
Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical
and computer engineering from Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, USA. He worked at Apple Inc.
as a custom circuit designer for application processors during 2017–2022. He is an
assistant professor at Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea. His research interests
have been in Power management IC and Display driver IC.