When the types of particles generated in the Poly-Si deposition process were investigated,
it was confirmed through EDX measurement that the particle generation map generated
during the Poly-Si film deposition process had a gathering tendency at three locations
on the wafer edge, as shown by the red spots in Fig. 1(a). The image of the generated particles was observed through SEM measurement, as shown
in Fig. 1(b). It was confirmed that particles were concentrated on a specific corner and that
a seed was generated on the wafer before deposition and then deposited along with
Poly-Si. In Fig. 2, the top of the boat was relatively higher than the bottom in the Poly-Si deposition
process. It was possible to indirectly confirm the influence of the generated particles
on the vulnerability to gate induced drain leakage (GIDL), which causes problems in
the operation of the final device [8,
17-
19].
1. Study on the Types of Particle Generation in Poly-Si film in LPCVD furnace chamber
In the process, it was confirmed that the number of particles generated varies depending
on the upper and lower positions of the boat where the wafer is mounted and transferred
to the heater. Through this, the composition of the deposited film was inspected to
confirm the identity of the deposited film on the boat and the wafer, and 25 particles
generated in the mass production process were divided into 5 sections, and the occurrence
rate was confirmed by classifying them into P1 to P5 sections in order from the top
to the bottom of the boat. As a result, it was found that the occurrence rate was
relatively higher in the P1 and P5 sections than in the middle sections of P2 and
P3, and it was confirmed that there was a particularly high occurrence in the P1 section
through Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Longitudinal cross-sectional view of the furnace with heaters, coolers, and
inner thermocouples [21] and particle emission rates by zone of the boat during long-term mass production.
In Fig. 4, (a) is an SEM image with a Si film deposited on the boat in the P1 area, and (b)
is an SEM image with a Si film deposited on the boat in the P4 area. It was confirmed
that the particle source was more relatively distributed in the image of the P1 area.
When analyzing the composition of the components shown in the (c) image, it was confirmed
that most of them were Si components.
Fig. 4. The results of the component analysis of (a) boat top region, (b) boat bottom
region, and (c) compound peak counts.
From the review of previous studies, it was confirmed that the average temperature
of the wafers located near 0 and 1, which are the top parts of the boat, were about
30 to 40 K lower than the average temperature of the wafers located in the center.
This is due to the structure of the equipment, where the gas inlet at the bottom and
the outlet at the top are close to the quartz tube area where the linear temperature
distribution is exposed [4]. In the previous study, it was confirmed that the temperature difference in the temperature
profile graph showed a similar number of particle defects from zone P1 to P5. As a
result, it was confirmed that the particle generation was the highest in P1, which
is the relatively coldest region, and the number of particles increased in the P5
region. This indicates that wafer warpage accelerates particle induction. To prove
this, the vibration of the top and bottom parts of the boat was checked using AVS,
and the vibration results are shown in Fig. 5. The red color represents the vibration result of the top region, and the blue color
represents the vibration result of the bottom region. As expected, the vibration of
the top region was measured to be 1.045G and the vibration of the bottom region was
measured to be 1.028G, confirming that the vibration of the top part is greater. It
was confirmed that when a temperature difference occurs between the upper and lower
parts of the boat, the heater power increases to compensate for the temperature, which
increases the temperature difference between the middle and outer parts of the wafer,
thereby worsening the wafer warpage phenomenon.
Fig. 5. Red color is top region, and blue color is bottom region for boat by accelerated
vibration service (AVS).
At each boat position, scratches on the backside of the wafers were measured (using
a 3-rod type boat) to check their lengths. The increase in friction on the backside
of the wafers was compared by taking SEM images. In addition, wafer vibrations were
measured using an AVS at a speed of 1000 mm/min. The level of scratch occurrence was
1.79 μm in the top area and 1.39 μm in the bottom area, and it can be seen in Fig. 6 that the top area has a greater degree of wafer damage.
Fig. 6. Comparison of wafer scratch depth (μm) between the top and bottom region of
the boat.
We conducted experiments under the conditions of Table 1 to find the conditions that alleviate the occurrence of wafer warpage. To evaluate
the conditions for changing the stabilization time before starting the process, we
placed thermocouple wafers at the top, center, and bottom of the boat, adjusted the
boat speed, and reflected wait times of 0 min, 30 min, and 50 min from the reference
value state, respectively. We adjusted the boat speed to 1000 mm/min (120 s required
@open to close position) and 100 mm/min (960 s required @open to close position) and
reflected the temperature ramp difference conditions (0 °C and 100 °C difference @
after boat load completion and low-pressure pumping start time). At this time, as
shown in Fig. 7, when a certain stability was given, the top and bottom parts showed the most stable
values compared to the before index.
Table 1. Experimental conditions to mitigate wafer warpage.
|
Items
|
Unit
|
Value
|
|
Temperature gap (Process - standby)
|
°C
|
0, 100
|
|
Wait time
|
min
|
0, 30, 50
|
|
S.Pump step N2 flow
|
slm
|
0, 10, 20
|
|
Boat speed
|
mm/min
|
100, 1000
|
Fig. 7. Evaluation of back side (B/S) scratch depth (μm) verification results by evaluation
conditions.
Based on the above results, the wait time (Process - Standby, °C) was subdivided into
5-minute intervals from 0 minutes to 50 minutes, and the particle evaluation of the
top and bottom parts was performed. The results were confirmed. In the S.Pump Step
(the step where pumping down starts at low pressure after the standby step), the N2 flow rate was evaluated in the order of 0 slm, 2, 4, 8, 9, 10, and 20 slm, and the
particle results were confirmed. As shown in Fig. 8, the particle increase with wait time showed a change in stability after a stabilization
time of about 15 minutes, where the particle map concentrated at the rad part of the
boat of the wafer shown in red, as shown in the particle map of the wafer indicated
in blue, disappeared. Additionally, in the experiment reflecting the change in N2 flow rate to control convective heat transfer, it was confirmed that the point at
which the top (T) and bottom (B) parts commonly stabilize is from about 4 slm or more
when checking the particle map of the wafer. Prior to subsequent evaluation using
the T/C wafer, particle evaluation was performed using NPW. Results showed that at
a boat speed of 100 mm/min, a N2 concentration of 10 slm did not significantly differ from 20 slm in the upper region,
but slightly better results (average 0.74) were observed in the lower region. This
suggests that excessive N2 concentration may be the cause of the supercooling problem [22,
23].
Fig. 8. The result of the change in the number of particles with changes in waiting
time at the top and bottom of the boat.
As shown in Fig. 9(a), a T/C wafer with 17 points that can be read in-wafer was placed in the boat slots
of top (T), center (C), and bottom (B) to evaluate the temperature difference between
the center point and edge point of the wafer to minimize wafer warpage. From the above
results, when the wait time was 0 min, T showed an in-wafer temperature difference
of 15.55 °C, C showed 13.72 °C, and B showed 12.8 °C. As shown in Fig. 9(b), when the wait time was 30 min, the particle-defective areas T and B decreased to
11.08 °C and 9.78 °C, respectively. Additionally, by adjusting the amount of N2 in the S.pump step, when the wait time was 20 min and 10 slm (N2 at S.pump step) was applied to the top area, which was the most particle-defective
area, the most stable value of 10.42 °C was confirmed.
Fig. 9. (a) Before edge to center delta temperature for top, middle and bottom zone;
(b) edge to center delta temperature for top (T), center (C), and bottom (B) zone
by addition 30-min wait time; (c) comparison of edge-to-center delta temperature in
the top zone before and after treatment (20-minute wait and N2 flow 10 slm).
2. Study on the Types of Particle Generation in Poly-Si film in Boat of LPCVD furnace
chamber
In the accumulated usage of more than 100,000 Å, the failure of the rod area in the
slot of the boat where the wafer is directly placed was analyzed. The particle was
examined in the poor top area, P1 zone, and the relatively good P3 zone. The inspection
area was divided into 1-4 areas as shown in Fig. 10. The results showed that the peeling phenomenon of the film deposited in the P1 zone
areas 1 and 3 was relatively severe. In Fig. 11, the hydrogen concentration of the Poly-Si film deposited on the Non-Pattern Wafer
(NPW) at the top, middle, and bottom of the boat was confirmed using TOF-SIMS, but
no significant level was found. Additionally, a NPW sample was prepared and an average
of 1.75 μm of Poly-Si was deposited. The morphology was confirmed to be poor using
a vertical scanning electron microscope (VSEM) as shown in Fig. 12. This is made of quartz material and cleaned before use. The boat is regularly replaced
and generally performs a pre-deposition process without wafers for uniform deposition
on the wafer. This is called the pre-depo process. Initially, it can cause wafer distortion
during mass production due to unwanted morphology, which can increase the probability
of particle generation due to frictional impact. To resolve this issue, a method to
control the warpage of the wafer and increase the surface area of the boat to minimize
the accumulated thickness of Poly-Si is proposed. This allows for particle-stable
production.
Fig. 10. The result of the change in the number of particles with changes in waiting
time at the P1 zone and P3 zone of the boat.
Fig. 11. Hydrogen concentration at the wafer edge and center (CTR) region, top and
bottom of the wafer boat using TOF-SIMS.
Fig. 12. Morphology of NPW by vertical scanning electron microscope (VSEM).
We secured a delta of 10.42 °C through experiments to reduce the temperature difference
from the edge to the center of the wafer and added experiments to find favorable morphological
conditions on the boat surface, which was confirmed to be less than 1.2 μm in previous
studies [10]. Additionally, it was confirmed that the occurrence of cracks in the deposited film
becomes more severe as the thickness increases, even with small stresses [11]. To address this, we used VSEM experiments to examine the morphological state of
the boat rod and confirmed morphological stability when grown to 0.95 μm at 550 °C,
as shown in Fig. 13. Furthermore, to reduce the total thickness of the film deposited on the boat during
mass production, we modified the shape of the rod part of the boat to increase the
surface area by creating a trench in the lower part of the boat rad, as shown in Fig. 14, resulting in an increase of approximately 12.9% in surface area. As shown in Fig. 15, by reflecting the conditions in Table 2 in the long-term mass production evaluation, we confirmed that the particle reduction
effect was approximately 6.7% and verified that the mass production period could be
extended by approximately 30%. This confirmed that by increasing the surface area
and thus reducing the average thickness, favorable results for particles can be obtained.
Fig. 13. Morphology of wafer after Pre-Depo by VSEM.
Fig. 14. Boat rod images: (a) reference and (b) surface area increase for 12.9%.
Fig. 15. The improved item has been applied to the result particle counts: (a) boat
slot and (b) product wafer.
Table 2. Final apply conditions to mitigate wafer warpage.
|
Items (unit)
|
ΔT (Process-standby) °C
|
Wat time min
|
N2 (S. step) slm
|
Boat speed mm/min
|
|
Reference
|
100
|
5
|
0
|
1000
|
|
Apply
|
0
|
30
|
10
|
100
|